It could be a causal fallacy, for example one of the type "cum hoc, ergo propter hoc". That is to say: Correlation does not imply causation.

EDIT: Not everything that happens, happens for good reason. So if you don't know the cause, you can't classify it as unique or even good.

It could be a causal fallacy, for example one of the type "cum hoc, ergo propter hoc". That is to say: Correlation does not imply causation.

EDIT: Not everything that happens, happens for good reason. So if you don't know the cause, you can't classify it as unique or even good. (fallatia ad ignorantiam)

It could be a causal fallacy, for example one of the type "cum hoc, ergo propter hoc". That is to say: Correlation does not imply causation.

It could be a causal fallacy, for example one of the type "cum hoc, ergo propter hoc". That is to say: Correlation does not imply causation.

EDIT: Not everything that happens, happens for good reason. So if you don't know the cause, you can't classify it as unique or even good.