Edit - Philosophy Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

1

a very good read, thank you! The extreme examples are of course iteratively refined into lesser extreme ones, until we reach a fuzzy region of indeterminacy or a distinct tipping point. My method is indeed an iterative computational method deriving from computer science - still, I was hoping to find the term in dialectics jargon! I just read about Loki's Wager [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loki%27s_Wager] and seems to be somewhat related, albeit in my case the goal is not to proclaim indeterminacy, but to expose subtleties in arguments that wouldn't be evident if not poked from all sides
– FotisK
Commented Aug 19, 2018 at 13:37

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)
<https://example.com>
[example](https://example.com)
<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »