Timeline for Is it a fallacy to argue or morally judge by treating earlier and later times as if in the same present?

10 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Dec 8, 2016 at 1:01	history	edited	Conifold	CC BY-SA 3.0	edited title
Nov 19, 2016 at 0:22	history	edited	Conifold	CC BY-SA 3.0	edited tags; edited title
Oct 9, 2016 at 13:25	history	tweeted			twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/785108875443920896
Oct 9, 2016 at 5:13	vote	accept	Dave Cousineau
Oct 9, 2016 at 2:22	history	edited	Conifold		edited tags
Oct 9, 2016 at 1:42	history	edited	Conifold	CC BY-SA 3.0	edited title
Oct 9, 2016 at 1:39	answer	added	Conifold		timeline score: 1
Oct 8, 2016 at 17:11	comment	added	user9166		You need either a better example or a different way of putting your notion of responsibility. Arguments 'for' abortion often consider the future person's likely misery as an unwanted child, arguments against it usually just declare that is already a person, whose death you are causing, and are not involving your 'fallacy'. As it is, I have no real clue what you mean, other than false assignment of effect or cause, and false predictions or false causes can rely upon a range of fallacies, not a single one.
Oct 8, 2016 at 16:42	review	First posts
Oct 9, 2016 at 0:14
Oct 8, 2016 at 16:38	history	asked	Dave Cousineau	CC BY-SA 3.0