Timeline for How have philosophers tried to argue for qualia?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 13, 2019 at 13:41 | comment | added | user20253 | Only if there is qualitative experience is there 'something it is like', and if there is then there is no need for faith, so I struggle with the question. It is not possible to convince someone there is 'something it is like' but no need to do so since they already know this. | |
Jan 13, 2019 at 12:07 | answer | added | user287279 | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 12, 2019 at 21:43 | answer | added | Bob | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 29, 2014 at 17:20 | comment | added | infatuated | I don't see how the intuition, qualitative experience and faith in respect to qualia are different? Don't they all refer to the subjective experience of qualia? Or did I misinterpret your sentence? | |
Aug 28, 2014 at 20:09 | comment | added | Calvin | I guess I'm unclear what provisional definition of qualia you are functioning under. | |
Aug 28, 2014 at 19:23 | comment | added | user6917 | ah it SHOULD be so obvious that that's what i'm asking that it doesn't warrant clarification. i'm sorry. | |
Aug 28, 2014 at 19:18 | comment | added | Calvin | Dropping in from the TM conscious question since this was linked. I know an exposition on Qualia as faith-based was requested but I don't see that being relevant to the question at hand. Let me know if I'm misunderstanding it somehow. | |
Aug 27, 2014 at 16:39 | answer | added | Dave | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 26, 2014 at 23:12 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/504406055477325824 | ||
Aug 25, 2014 at 22:40 | history | edited | Joseph Weissman♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
tried to clarify headline; removing ambiguous sentence-fragment 'quote' from an unspecified comment
|
Aug 25, 2014 at 22:22 | history | asked | user6917 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |