Skip to main content
added 20 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10

Q.E.D.

Q E.D.

Q.E.D.

Q E.D.

deleted 45 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
  1. a,b,c are arbitrary specific constants and a=b and b=c. [OSC1]
  2. ∀w[P(w) iff ~(w = c) [Df]
  3. P(a) iff ~(a=c) [2;UI]
  4. P(b) iff ~(b=c) [2;UI]
  5. a=b [1; simplification]
  6. If a = b & P(a) then P(b) [substitution]
  7. If a=b & ~(a=c) then ~(b=c) [3,4,6;5; rule of replacement]
  8. If a=b then (if ~(a=c) then ~(b=c) ) [7;[6; EXPORTATION]
  9. If a=b then (if b=c then a=c) [8;trans][7;trans]
  10. If a=b and b=c then a=c [9;IMPORTATION][8;IMPORTATION]
  11. ∀A∀B∀C[if A=B & B=C then A=C], where A,B,C are specific constants [10;UG][9;UG]
  1. a,b,c are arbitrary specific constants and a=b and b=c [OSC1]
  2. ∀w[P(w) iff ~(w = c) [Df]
  3. P(a) iff ~(a=c) [2;UI]
  4. P(b) iff ~(b=c) [2;UI]
  5. a=b [1; simplification]
  6. If a = b & P(a) then P(b) [substitution]
  7. If a=b & ~(a=c) then ~(b=c) [3,4,6; rule of replacement]
  8. If a=b then (if ~(a=c) then ~(b=c) ) [7; EXPORTATION]
  9. If a=b then (if b=c then a=c) [8;trans]
  10. If a=b and b=c then a=c [9;IMPORTATION]
  11. ∀A∀B∀C[if A=B & B=C then A=C], where A,B,C are specific constants [10;UG]
  1. a,b,c are arbitrary specific constants. [OSC1]
  2. ∀w[P(w) iff ~(w = c) [Df]
  3. P(a) iff ~(a=c) [2;UI]
  4. P(b) iff ~(b=c) [2;UI]
  5. If a = b & P(a) then P(b) [substitution]
  6. If a=b & ~(a=c) then ~(b=c) [3,4,5; rule of replacement]
  7. If a=b then (if ~(a=c) then ~(b=c) ) [6; EXPORTATION]
  8. If a=b then (if b=c then a=c) [7;trans]
  9. If a=b and b=c then a=c [8;IMPORTATION]
  10. ∀A∀B∀C[if A=B & B=C then A=C], where A,B,C are specific constants [9;UG]
added 716 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10

Line 4 is true, and has a truth value that is constant in time, so it is necessarily true, by my understanding of temporal modal logic.

  1. ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] ∨ P(xi) } [4; modal logic]
  2. ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } ∨ P(xi) [5; modal logic]
  3. ◊¬{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] }
  4. ~☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } [7;Df]
  5. P(xi) [6,8;DS]} [4; TML]

If it is possible that all the P(xi)'s have a truth value that varies in time, then they could all simultaneously be false, in which case line 5 would be false. Therefore at least one of the P(xi)'s has a truth value that is constant in time. Let it be P(xi). Therefore

  1. If ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] ∨ P(xi) } then ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } ∨ P(xi) [5; TML]

  2. ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } ∨ P(xi) [5,6; MP]

It is possible that all the P(xi)'s except P(xi) have a truth value that varies in time, so they could all be simultaneously false. Therefore

  1. ◊¬{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] }
  2. ~☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } [8;Df]
  3. P(xi) [7,9;DS]

Line 4 is true, and has a truth value that is constant in time, so it is necessarily true, by my understanding of modal logic.

  1. ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] ∨ P(xi) } [4; modal logic]
  2. ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } ∨ P(xi) [5; modal logic]
  3. ◊¬{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] }
  4. ~☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } [7;Df]
  5. P(xi) [6,8;DS]

Line 4 is true, and has a truth value that is constant in time, so it is necessarily true, by my understanding of temporal modal logic.

  1. ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] ∨ P(xi) } [4; TML]

If it is possible that all the P(xi)'s have a truth value that varies in time, then they could all simultaneously be false, in which case line 5 would be false. Therefore at least one of the P(xi)'s has a truth value that is constant in time. Let it be P(xi). Therefore

  1. If ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] ∨ P(xi) } then ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } ∨ P(xi) [5; TML]

  2. ☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } ∨ P(xi) [5,6; MP]

It is possible that all the P(xi)'s except P(xi) have a truth value that varies in time, so they could all be simultaneously false. Therefore

  1. ◊¬{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] }
  2. ~☐{[[P(x1) ∨ P(x2) ∨... P(xi-1)] ∨ [P(xi+1 ∨...]] } [8;Df]
  3. P(xi) [7,9;DS]
added 169 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 169 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 446 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 93 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
deleted 88 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
deleted 433 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
deleted 227 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
deleted 227 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 647 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 411 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 411 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
deleted 13 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 304 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 304 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 387 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 387 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
added 387 characters in body
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
Source Link
lee pappas
  • 1.5k
  • 1
  • 10
Loading