Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 5 at 9:42 answer added ElliFo timeline score: 1
S Jun 16 at 16:02 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Jun 16 at 16:02 history notice removed CommunityBot
Jun 8 at 23:05 comment added Scott Rowe Oh, gosh, it wouldn't qualify as Philosophy, even if I could recall the details well. I think it amounted to: pay attention to the people around you and their needs, rather than thinking about Jesus so much. I was once stopped cold when I heard a radio preacher say: "To Jesus, ministry was the person standing in front of Him at the time." I think that outweighs all the Law and all the Prophets.
Jun 8 at 22:50 comment added user66156 @ScottRowe Would you mind fleshing that reason out?
Jun 8 at 22:36 comment added Scott Rowe For some reason, I am reminded of a sermon I heard decades ago called, "Looking for a recognizable Christ."
S Jun 8 at 14:30 history bounty started CommunityBot
S Jun 8 at 14:30 history notice added user66156 Draw attention
May 27 at 4:28 comment added Conifold First bullet - yes on any reasonable conception of "evidence". Second bullet - no, the reliable process may well be cognitively inaccessible to the agent, so evidence would not be available. Under reliabilism, even the content of knowledge may well depend on external factors beyond the agent's reach. Generally, evidentialism/reliabilism in epistemology are closely affiliated with internalism/externalism in semantics. If "meanings just ain't in the head", as Putnam quipped, then the link between justification and evidence is broken.
May 26 at 22:11 comment added NotThatGuy Evidentialism doesn't seem to directly concern itself with reliability. What it means for evidence to "support believing" something seems to be left up to interpretation - if you define that in terms of reliability, then that may be pretty close to a subset of reliabilism.
May 26 at 20:26 history asked user66156 CC BY-SA 4.0