Skip to main content
Mod Moved Comments To Chat
Became Hot Network Question
deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
user66156
user66156

Can I be justified in believing in a proposition X through a justification that doesn't meet the requirementsstandards of the scientific method? What sorts of beliefs would be justifiable in this way (non-scientifically), and what would a non-scientific justification look like?

Are there illustrative examples discussed in the academic literature of beliefs that can be justified non-scientifically?

Can I be justified in believing in a proposition X through a justification that doesn't meet the requirements of the scientific method? What sorts of beliefs would be justifiable in this way (non-scientifically), and what would a non-scientific justification look like?

Are there illustrative examples discussed in the academic literature of beliefs that can be justified non-scientifically?

Can I be justified in believing in a proposition X through a justification that doesn't meet the standards of the scientific method? What sorts of beliefs would be justifiable in this way (non-scientifically), and what would a non-scientific justification look like?

Are there illustrative examples discussed in the academic literature of beliefs that can be justified non-scientifically?

Source Link
user66156
user66156

What sorts of beliefs can be justified non-scientifically?

Can I be justified in believing in a proposition X through a justification that doesn't meet the requirements of the scientific method? What sorts of beliefs would be justifiable in this way (non-scientifically), and what would a non-scientific justification look like?

Are there illustrative examples discussed in the academic literature of beliefs that can be justified non-scientifically?