Timeline for Why should I not believe there are true contradictions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7 at 15:49 | comment | added | Wayne Irving | @Corbin Thanks for the reply and I've started looking into it ever since I read the top voted question on this thread. Again thanks for the reply. | |
| May 7 at 4:40 | comment | added | Corbin | There is actually an entire philosophical approach, called dialethism or "two truths", which explores flavors of logic that do not have a Law of Non-Contradiction and thus no Principle of Explosion. Graham Priest defined dialethism as the belief that there are true contradictions; this is what the question is implicitly referencing. | |
| S May 6 at 19:06 | review | First answers | |||
| May 6 at 19:10 | |||||
| S May 6 at 19:06 | history | edited | Wayne Irving | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 102 characters in body
|
| May 6 at 18:56 | history | edited | Wayne Irving | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| S May 6 at 18:55 | review | First answers | |||
| May 6 at 18:57 | |||||
| S May 6 at 18:55 | history | edited | Wayne Irving | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 105 characters in body
|
| May 6 at 18:31 | history | edited | Wayne Irving | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 144 characters in body
|
| May 6 at 18:17 | comment | added | Wayne Irving | Actually logic is more of a language. Due to the west's adherence to individualism alot of the language we use is based on it, which informs our logical conclusions. | |
| May 6 at 17:21 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| May 6 at 18:32 | |||||
| May 6 at 16:47 | history | edited | Wayne Irving | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 677 characters in body
|
| S May 6 at 15:54 | review | First answers | |||
| May 6 at 17:33 | |||||
| S May 6 at 15:54 | history | answered | Wayne Irving | CC BY-SA 4.0 |