Return to Answer

It is a flaw in logic itself. It's funny I just made a similar post.

Edit: Logic is a type of language that cannot tolerate contradiction. This is why the word "wulture" does not make sense when used in logic.

Logic is a way of describing the world that cannot tolerate contradiction. The idea of a "wulture" is an idea of logic (splitting things that are white and things that are vultures apart) that has no actual influence on the real world, just how people who adhere to it perceive things. As soon as a white vulture appears all of a sudden you can choose what aspect you want to adhere too. Do you want to adhere to the idea that a "wulture" applies to all that is vultures or do you want to appeal to the idea that it excludes all things that are white. It is actually both at the same time, it's just you who thinks that you need to choose.

Logic is based in individualism. The idea that everything is made up of parts. When you use logic to dissect an object you automatically start splitting it into parts. The things is once you've split something into parts you miss what that thing is.

For instance I can list all of the aspects of you but those aspects aren't you. That list of aspects aren't you. The combination of those aspects are you. There are no logical operators for combination. If you have a stick and you get another stick you haven't combined the sticks. You just have two sticks.

If you view the world in holistic terms such as collectivism, everything is part of the whole, you can be okay with contradiction because you don't necessitate that everything needs to be split up into parts.

Something can be true and false not due to logic but simply because it exist and if it exist than it is part of the whole. You have no choice in the matter.

Or you can admit that it exist but that your language (logic in this case) fails to explain it.

It is a flaw in logic itself. It's funny I just made a similar post.

Edit: Logic is a type of language that cannot tolerate contradiction. This is why the word "wulture" does not make sense when used in logic.

Logic is a way of describing the world that cannot tolerate contradiction. The idea of a "wulture" is an idea of logic (splitting things that are white and things that are vultures apart) that has no actual influence on the real world, just how people who adhere to it perceive things. As soon as a white vulture appears all of a sudden you can choose what aspect you want to adhere too. Do you want to adhere to the idea that a "wulture" applies to all that is vultures or do you want to appeal to the idea that it excludes all things that are white. It is actually both at the same time, it's just you who thinks that you need to choose.

Logic is based in individualism. The idea that everything is made up of parts. When you use logic to dissect an object you automatically start splitting it into parts. The things is once you've split something into parts you miss what that thing is.

For instance I can list all of the aspects of you but those aspects aren't you. That list of aspects aren't you. The combination of those aspects are you. There are no logical operators for combination. If you have a stick and you get another stick you haven't combined the sticks. You just have two sticks.

If you view the world in holistic terms such as collectivism, everything is part of the whole, you can be okay with contradiction because you don't necessitate that everything needs to be split up into parts.

Something can be true and false, using the language of logic you cannot describe it, but a language based in a more collective perspective may be able to.

It is a flaw in logic itself. It's funny I just made a similar post.

Edit: Logic is a type of language that cannot tolerate contradiction. This is why the word "wulture" does not make sense when used in logic.

Logic is a way of describing the world that cannot tolerate contradiction. The idea of a "wulture" is an idea of logic (splitting things that are white and things that are vultures apart) that has no actual influence on the real world, just how people who adhere to it perceive things. As soon as a white vulture appears all of a sudden you can choose what aspect you want to adhere too. Do you want to adhere to the idea that a "wulture" applies to all that is vultures or do you want to appeal to the idea that it excludes all things that are white. It is actually both at the same time, it's just you who thinks that you need to choose.

Logic is based in individualism. The idea that everything is made up of parts. When you use logic to dissect an object you automatically start splitting it into parts. The things is once you've split something into parts you miss what that thing is.

For instance I can list all of the aspects of you but those aspects aren't you. That list of aspects aren't you. The combination of those aspects are you. There are no logical operators for combination. If you have a stick and you get another stick you haven't combined the sticks. You just have two sticks.

If you view the world in holistic terms such as collectivism, everything is part of the whole, you can be okay with contradiction because you don't necessitate that everything needs to be split up into parts.

Something can be true and false not due to logic but simply because it exist and if it exist than it is part of the whole. You have no choice in the matter.

Or you can admit that it exist and but that your language(logic in this case) fails to comprehend it.

It is a flaw in logic itself. It's funny I just made a similar post.

Edit: Logic is a type of language that cannot tolerate contradiction. This is why the word "wulture" does not make sense when used in logic.

Logic is a way of describing the world that cannot tolerate contradiction. The idea of a "wulture" is an idea of logic (splitting things that are white and things that are vultures apart) that has no actual influence on the real world, just how people who adhere to it perceive things. As soon as a white vulture appears all of a sudden you can choose what aspect you want to adhere too. Do you want to adhere to the idea that a "wulture" applies to all that is vultures or do you want to appeal to the idea that it excludes all things that are white. It is actually both at the same time, it's just you who thinks that you need to choose.

Logic is based in individualism. The idea that everything is made up of parts. When you use logic to dissect an object you automatically start splitting it into parts. The things is once you've split something into parts you miss what that thing is.

For instance I can list all of the aspects of you but those aspects aren't you. That list of aspects aren't you. The combination of those aspects are you. There are no logical operators for combination. If you have a stick and you get another stick you haven't combined the sticks. You just have two sticks.

If you view the world in holistic terms such as collectivism, everything is part of the whole, you can be okay with contradiction because you don't necessitate that everything needs to be split up into parts.

Something can be true and false not due to logic but simply because it exist and if it exist than it is part of the whole. You have no choice in the matter.

Or you can admit that it exist but that your language  (logic in this case) fails to explain it.

It is a flaw in logic itself. It's funny I just made a similar post.

Edit: Logic is a type of language that cannot tolerate contradiction. This is why the word "wulture" does not make sense when used in logic.

Logic is a way of describing the world that cannot tolerate contradiction. The idea of a "wulture" is an idea of logic (splitting things that are white and things that are vultures apart) that has no actual influence on the real world, just how people who adhere to it perceive things. As soon as a white vulture appears all of a sudden you can choose what aspect you want to adhere too. Do you want to adhere to the idea that a "wulture" applies to all that is vultures or do you want to appeal to the idea that it excludes all things that are white. It is actually both at the same time, it's just you who thinks that you need to choose.

Logic is based in individualism. The idea that everything is made up of parts. When you use logic to dissect an object you automatically start splitting it into parts. The things is once you've split something into parts you miss what that thing is.

For instance I can list all of the aspects of you but those aspects aren't you. That list of aspects aren't you. The combination of those aspects are you. There are no logical operators for combination. If you have a stick and you get another stick you haven't combined the sticks. You just have two sticks.

If you view the world in holistic terms such as collectivism, everything is part of the whole, you can be okay with contradiction because you don't necessitate that everything needs to be split up into parts.

Something can be true and false not due to logic but simply because it exist and if it exist than it is part of the whole. You have no choice in the matter.

It is a flaw in logic itself. It's funny I just made a similar post.

Edit: Logic is a type of language that cannot tolerate contradiction. This is why the word "wulture" does not make sense when used in logic.

Logic is a way of describing the world that cannot tolerate contradiction. The idea of a "wulture" is an idea of logic (splitting things that are white and things that are vultures apart) that has no actual influence on the real world, just how people who adhere to it perceive things. As soon as a white vulture appears all of a sudden you can choose what aspect you want to adhere too. Do you want to adhere to the idea that a "wulture" applies to all that is vultures or do you want to appeal to the idea that it excludes all things that are white. It is actually both at the same time, it's just you who thinks that you need to choose.

Logic is based in individualism. The idea that everything is made up of parts. When you use logic to dissect an object you automatically start splitting it into parts. The things is once you've split something into parts you miss what that thing is.

For instance I can list all of the aspects of you but those aspects aren't you. That list of aspects aren't you. The combination of those aspects are you. There are no logical operators for combination. If you have a stick and you get another stick you haven't combined the sticks. You just have two sticks.

If you view the world in holistic terms such as collectivism, everything is part of the whole, you can be okay with contradiction because you don't necessitate that everything needs to be split up into parts.

Something can be true and false not due to logic but simply because it exist and if it exist than it is part of the whole. You have no choice in the matter.

Or you can admit that it exist and but that your language(logic in this case) fails to comprehend it.