Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • Actually logic is more of a language. Due to the west's adherence to individualism alot of the language we use is based on it, which informs our logical conclusions. Commented May 6 at 18:17
  • 1
    There is actually an entire philosophical approach, called dialethism or "two truths", which explores flavors of logic that do not have a Law of Non-Contradiction and thus no Principle of Explosion. Graham Priest defined dialethism as the belief that there are true contradictions; this is what the question is implicitly referencing.
    – Corbin
    Commented May 7 at 4:40
  • 1
    @Corbin Thanks for the reply and I've started looking into it ever since I read the top voted question on this thread. Again thanks for the reply. Commented May 7 at 15:49