Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • i am sorry if this question is too psychological/explorative
    – andrós
    Commented Apr 21 at 3:39
  • 1
    Do you mean "does K = JTB imply KK"? Because KK only involves the knowledge concept and surely cannot imply anything about belief or justification. JTB, and internalism generally, does not imply KK strictly speaking, but it makes it plausible, see IEP:"it is natural for internalists to say that one is always in a position to know whether one’s beliefs are warranted... [also] it seems clear that anyone who knows that p is in a position to know that their belief that p is true; so it is natural for internalists to endorse the KK principle."
    – Conifold
    Commented Apr 21 at 4:05
  • "Do you mean "does K = JTB imply KK"?" yes that is what I mean @Conifold has that sufficiently clarified the question for you?
    – andrós
    Commented Apr 21 at 4:14
  • 2
    Sure, but, for the benefit of others, would you mind editing the title?
    – Conifold
    Commented Apr 21 at 4:20
  • 1
    Just stop before KKK. But you could listen to KKKK.
    – Scott Rowe
    Commented Apr 21 at 11:23