Timeline for Is infinity a concept or a word empty of meaning?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6 at 19:39 | comment | added | kouty | I'm so sorry. I know almost only french language and in french there is no such "z". And I read mainly American English in professional topics. So I apologize. | |
| Apr 6 at 19:26 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | @kouty: There's nothing wrong with my spelling of "generalise". It is standard British English spelling whereas the spelling you chose - "generalize" is US spelling. Being British, I of course prefer the British spelling. This is one reason why I rejected your proposed edit. | |
| S Apr 6 at 19:24 | history | edited | Mozibur Ullah | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Apr 6 at 19:06 | comment | added | kouty | The concept of all has a great advantage. We have no minded representation of all. The cause of all is only "defined" by negative attributes. In summary it's not similar to any finite thing. So infinity is an attribute of finite objects regarding their lack of "allness". Your answer touch this very important point. Thanks so much! | |
| Apr 6 at 18:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 6 at 19:24 | |||||
| Apr 6 at 18:07 | history | answered | Mozibur Ullah | CC BY-SA 4.0 |