Timeline for Is infinity a concept or a word empty of meaning?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 7 at 1:44 | history | edited | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
Apr 7 at 0:43 | history | edited | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 475 characters in body
|
Apr 7 at 0:21 | history | edited | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 475 characters in body
|
Apr 6 at 23:38 | comment | added | How why e | @kouty Exactly, yeah this is how you realize that infinity shouldn't really be categorized a "number' so much so just a concept. A concept of continual rate of increment. | |
Apr 6 at 18:12 | comment | added | kouty | Very interesting. So infinity is a concept of charging endless the actual state. It's says that there is no way to stop it . But the every step linked object is finite. | |
Apr 6 at 10:12 | history | edited | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 39 characters in body
|
Apr 5 at 13:20 | history | edited | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Apr 5 at 12:22 | history | edited | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Complex numbers
|
Apr 5 at 12:08 | history | edited | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
But again remember that there are no actual circles or figures in "objective" reality, what does that say about your previous statement surely a beautiful paradox. Paradoxes are beyond human comprehension. But take the quantum computer that works on a state of superposition i.e., 0,1 and 0&1.
|
Apr 5 at 11:40 | history | edited | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
use of the concept of infinities to get to "objective" reality - it's implications are really huge
|
Apr 5 at 11:35 | history | edited | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 80 characters in body
|
Apr 5 at 11:21 | history | answered | How why e | CC BY-SA 4.0 |