Edit - Philosophy Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Rev

Obviously I can imagine something that do works endless. Your example is precisely about programing. The computer works through the time and I know that. .
– kouty
Commented Apr 5 at 10:33
2

@kouty See my newly added example. Try and reflect on The syntax is finite; the meaning (also called semantics) is infinite.
– Rushi
Commented Apr 5 at 11:29
2

@Rushi Haskell is one heck of a programming language, a headache to learn yet beautiful once understood. Good on you for explanation.
– How why e
Commented Apr 5 at 11:32
Now I reread your answer. That's very interesting regarding the semantic -syntactical comparison. The cardinality of natural numbers remains always Aleph zero. This is the problem.
– kouty
Commented May 31 at 8:45
1

I like „from time import sleep“ in a philosophy answer on infinity. Very poetic!
– wra
Commented Jun 2 at 6:51

| Show 1 more comment

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)
<https://example.com>
[example](https://example.com)
<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »