Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • Why the downvote? Commented Apr 5 at 7:41
  • Not down voted from me!
    – kouty
    Commented Apr 5 at 7:50
  • But maybe by this way that the imagination doesn't touch knowledge, the rules of a game don't teach nothing about logical necessity.
    – kouty
    Commented Apr 5 at 8:13
  • @kouty Which game do you mean? Where does your question refer to "logical necessity"?
    – Jo Wehler
    Commented Apr 5 at 9:06
  • 3
    @Kouty I agree that mathematics strives for clear concepts and logical argumentation of its proofs. But mathematics does not strive for necessity in the sense of necessary facts versus contingent facts in our world: Mathematics provides a whole bunch of geometries different from the Euclidean geometry. But mathematics does not ask which geometry explains best our observations in cosmology.
    – Jo Wehler
    Commented Apr 5 at 10:00