Edit - Philosophy Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Right, right, the "doomed to repeat" idea, it certainly applies to engineering too. I sometimes feel that I found a way around or over the brick walls, but I'm sure I could be deluding myself due to my lack of background. Mainly I feel that in many cases discursive thought is the actual cause of the problem, and it evaporates if we go a different route. Perhaps that's the idea I want to raise in most cases here. Kind of silly though.
– Scott Rowe
Commented Feb 2 at 11:24

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)
<https://example.com>
[example](https://example.com)
<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »