If we keep asking "why" are we guaranteed to end up in one of the three states of the Münchhausen Trilemma?

The ultimate why-question is why is reality what it is. Reality is by definition the whole of what exists. If something is outside reality, it just doesn't exist. So, why is reality what it is? To explain something, we need something else to explain it with. However, there is nothing outside reality, so there is nothing we could explain reality with. Thus, there is just no possible logical explanation as to why reality is what it is. We have to accept that our best answer is that reality is just what it is.

This isn't a problem. We don't need any explanation. Any explanation would make no sense. However, it does show that we cannot pursue why-questions up to some ultimate reason for everything, although reality itself seems a good reason to me. But the fact is, at some point, it is no longer reasonable to even ask a why-question.

The Münchhausen Trilemma is also not a problem. Humans possess an innate knowledge of some things. For example, I know pain whenever I am in pain. I know redness whenever I have the impression that I am looking at something red. Nobody even needs to justify knowledge. When we know something, we just do, and we make the best of it, including smart philosophers like the German philosopher Hans Albert, who in 1968 coined the phrase "the Münchhausen Trilemma".

If we keep asking "why" are we guaranteed to end up in one of the three states of the Münchhausen Trilemma?

The ultimate why-question is why is reality what it is. Reality is by definition the whole of what exists. If something is outside reality, it just doesn't exist. So, why is reality what it is? To explain something, we need something else to explain it with. However, there is nothing outside reality, so there is nothing we could explain reality with. Thus, there is just no possible logical explanation as to why reality is what it is. We have to accept that our best answer is that reality is just what it is.

This isn't a problem. We don't need any explanation. Any explanation would make no sense. However, it does show that we cannot pursue why-questions ad libitum. Reality is the ultimate reason for everything. At this point, it is no longer reasonable to even ask a why-question.

The Münchhausen Trilemma is also not a problem. Humans possess an innate knowledge of some things. For example, I know pain whenever I am in pain. I know redness whenever I have the impression that I am looking at something red. Nobody even needs to justify knowledge. When we know something, we just do, and we make the best of it, including smart philosophers like the German philosopher Hans Albert, who in 1968 coined the phrase "the Münchhausen Trilemma".

If we keep asking "why" are we guaranteed to end up in one of the three states of the Münchhausen Trilemma?

The ultimate why-question is why is reality what it is. Reality is by definition the whole of what exists. If something is outside reality, it just doesn't exist. So, why is reality what it is? To explain something, we need something else to explain it with. However, there is nothing outside reality, so there is nothing we could explain reality with. Thus, there is just no possible logical explanation as to why reality is what it is. We have to accept that our best answer is that reality is just what it is.

This isn't a problem. We don't need any explanation. Any explanation would make no sense. However, it does show that we cannot pursue why-questions up to some ultimate reason for everything, although reality itself seems a good reason to me. But the fact is, at some point, it is no longer reasonable to even ask a why-question.

The Münchhausen Trilemma is also not a problem. Humans possess an innate knowledge of some things. For example, I know pain whenever I am in pain. I know redness whenever I have the impression that I am looking at something red. Nobody even need to justify knowledge. When we know something, we just do, and we make the best of it, including smart philosophers like the German philosopher Hans Albert who coined the phrase "the Münchhausen Trilemma" in 1968.

If we keep asking "why" are we guaranteed to end up in one of the three states of the Münchhausen Trilemma?

The ultimate why-question is why is reality what it is. Reality is by definition the whole of what exists. If something is outside reality, it just doesn't exist. So, why is reality what it is? To explain something, we need something else to explain it with. However, there is nothing outside reality, so there is nothing we could explain reality with. Thus, there is just no possible logical explanation as to why reality is what it is. We have to accept that our best answer is that reality is just what it is.

This isn't a problem. We don't need any explanation. Any explanation would make no sense. However, it does show that we cannot pursue why-questions up to some ultimate reason for everything, although reality itself seems a good reason to me. But the fact is, at some point, it is no longer reasonable to even ask a why-question.

The Münchhausen Trilemma is also not a problem. Humans possess an innate knowledge of some things. For example, I know pain whenever I am in pain. I know redness whenever I have the impression that I am looking at something red. Nobody even needs to justify knowledge. When we know something, we just do, and we make the best of it, including smart philosophers like the German philosopher Hans Albert, who in 1968 coined the phrase "the Münchhausen Trilemma".