Skip to main content
Philosophy

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 1
    Your text is not focused and does not ask a clear question. As you write "I’d like to leave off here until I can gather my thoughts further". Please rework your question.
    – Jo Wehler
    Commented Dec 20, 2023 at 18:29
  • X is a letter of the alfabet, that looks as a cross or it does a cross, so X = to cross,/ or it is a reference to else being. The problem that when people say woman or heard word woman, does not give a clear sense what they mean: they mean real woman - that can be their mother, or they use word woman as a reference on something else?
    – άνθρωπος
    Commented Dec 20, 2023 at 18:46
  • For a concept X you can have either a definition, in terms of previously known concepts, or a sort of elucidation, i.e. a discussion (sometimes a full book...) of its use and meaning, trying to circumvent the impossibility of a full explicit definition.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Commented Dec 21, 2023 at 6:56
  • If you are finding something about this question 'intense', you should really look in to Nonduality.
    – Scott Rowe
    Commented Dec 21, 2023 at 12:04
  • 1
    Hinted long ago by Diamond Sutra: Subhuti, if blessings and virtue were real, the Tathagata would not have spoken of obtaining many blessings. It is because blessings and virtue do not exist that the Tathagata has spoken of obtaining many blessings... The perfection of marks is spoken of by the Tathagata as no perfection of marks. Therefore it is called the perfection of marks...
    – Double Knot
    Commented Jan 20 at 22:19