Events in the natural world are determined to have temporal cause and a temporal effect. One temporal event is the cause of another temporal event which is the effect of that temporal cause and forms a chain, and this is considered natural. Considering the premise that there is a beginning to time, it logically follows that this event had no natural cause as natural causes and their effects are temporal in nature and there was no time before the beginning of time. Does this paradox mean that the only explanation of the cause of this first event, the beginning of time, had to have a non temporal non natural cause or rather a supernatural cause . Despite any evidence of a supernatural cause having any natural effect in the natural world since this first event. Is there thus no other explanation of the premise that there was a begining of time other than it had a supernatural cause, or natural events can happen without natural or supernatural causes ?

Events in the natural world are determined to have temporal cause and a temporal effect.

One temporal event is the cause of another temporal event which is the effect of that temporal cause and forms a chain, and this is considered natural. Considering the premise that there is a beginning to time, it logically follows that this event had no natural cause: natural causes and their effects are temporal in nature and there was no time before the beginning of time. 

Does this paradox mean that the only explanation of the cause of this first event, the beginning of time, had to have a non temporal non natural cause or rather a supernatural cause, despite any evidence of a supernatural cause having any natural effect in the natural world since this first event? Is there thus no other explanation of the premise that there was a beginning of time other than it had a supernatural cause, or natural events can happen without natural or supernatural causes ?

Events in the natural world are determined to have temporal cause and a temporal effect. One temporal event is the cause of another temporal event which is the effect of that temporal cause and forms a chain, and this is considered natural. Considering the premise that there is a beginning to time, it logically follows that this event had no natural cause as natural causes and there effects are temporal in nature and there was no time before the beginning of time. Does this paradox mean that the only explanation of the cause of this first event, the beginning of time, had to have a non temporal non natural cause or rather a supernatural cause . Despite any evidence of a supernatural cause having any natural effect in the natural world since this first event. Is there thus no other explanation of the premise that there was a begining of time other than it had a supernatural cause, or natural events can happen without natural or supernatural causes ?

Events in the natural world are determined to have temporal cause and a temporal effect. One temporal event is the cause of another temporal event which is the effect of that temporal cause and forms a chain, and this is considered natural. Considering the premise that there is a beginning to time, it logically follows that this event had no natural cause as natural causes and their effects are temporal in nature and there was no time before the beginning of time. Does this paradox mean that the only explanation of the cause of this first event, the beginning of time, had to have a non temporal non natural cause or rather a supernatural cause . Despite any evidence of a supernatural cause having any natural effect in the natural world since this first event. Is there thus no other explanation of the premise that there was a begining of time other than it had a supernatural cause, or natural events can happen without natural or supernatural causes ?