Skip to main content
replaced http://pets.stackexchange.com/ with https://pets.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Well, here's the thing: some of these solo answers are way comprehensive, and it's quite tough to add a second one.

Our options are to either say, "well, that's the way it is" or strategically target questions with less than 3 answers and add an answer if we haven't already (or, I guess, a second answer if you've already answered it once).

Granted, this isn't StackOverflow where there are 4^7 different programmatic solutions to concatenating Strings and everyone wants their say, so we do have that to consider.

Follow-up questions for thought:

  • Should this be brought to the forefront with the go-live evaluation committee?
  • Or is it something they've already taken into consideration?
  • Are the Area51 stats unrealistic for a site like this?
  • Is this possibly an aspect of having a small user group and the situation will remedy itself with the recently obvious growth?

That being said, I'm actively following the "add an answer" tactic; here are four results of that recent effort:

Well, here's the thing: some of these solo answers are way comprehensive, and it's quite tough to add a second one.

Our options are to either say, "well, that's the way it is" or strategically target questions with less than 3 answers and add an answer if we haven't already (or, I guess, a second answer if you've already answered it once).

Granted, this isn't StackOverflow where there are 4^7 different programmatic solutions to concatenating Strings and everyone wants their say, so we do have that to consider.

Follow-up questions for thought:

  • Should this be brought to the forefront with the go-live evaluation committee?
  • Or is it something they've already taken into consideration?
  • Are the Area51 stats unrealistic for a site like this?
  • Is this possibly an aspect of having a small user group and the situation will remedy itself with the recently obvious growth?

That being said, I'm actively following the "add an answer" tactic; here are four results of that recent effort:

Well, here's the thing: some of these solo answers are way comprehensive, and it's quite tough to add a second one.

Our options are to either say, "well, that's the way it is" or strategically target questions with less than 3 answers and add an answer if we haven't already (or, I guess, a second answer if you've already answered it once).

Granted, this isn't StackOverflow where there are 4^7 different programmatic solutions to concatenating Strings and everyone wants their say, so we do have that to consider.

Follow-up questions for thought:

  • Should this be brought to the forefront with the go-live evaluation committee?
  • Or is it something they've already taken into consideration?
  • Are the Area51 stats unrealistic for a site like this?
  • Is this possibly an aspect of having a small user group and the situation will remedy itself with the recently obvious growth?

That being said, I'm actively following the "add an answer" tactic; here are four results of that recent effort:

added 646 characters in body
Source Link
JoshDM
  • 9k
  • 12
  • 19

Well, here's the thing: some of these solo answers are way comprehensive, and it's quite tough to add a second one.

Our options are to either say, "well, that's the way it is" or strategically target questions with less than 3 answers and add an answer if we haven't already (or, I guess, a second answer if you've already answered it once).

Granted, this isn't StackOverflow where there are 4^7 different programmatic solutions to concatenating Strings and everyone wants their say, so we do have that to consider.

Follow-up questions for thought:

  • Should this be brought to the forefront with the go-live evaluation committee?
  • Or is it something they've already taken into consideration?
  • Are the Area51 stats unrealistic for a site like this?
  • Is this possibly an aspect of having a small user group and the situation will remedy itself with the recently obvious growth?

That being said, I'm actively following the "add an answer" tactic; here are four results of that recent effort:

Well, here's the thing: some of these solo answers are way comprehensive, and it's quite tough to add a second one.

Our options are to either say, "well, that's the way it is" or strategically target questions with less than 3 answers and add an answer if we haven't already (or, I guess, a second answer if you've already answered it once).

Granted, this isn't StackOverflow where there are 4^7 different programmatic solutions to concatenating Strings and everyone wants their say, so we do have that to consider.

Follow-up questions for thought:

  • Should this be brought to the forefront with the go-live evaluation committee?
  • Or is it something they've already taken into consideration?
  • Are the Area51 stats unrealistic for a site like this?
  • Is this possibly an aspect of having a small user group and the situation will remedy itself with the recently obvious growth?

Well, here's the thing: some of these solo answers are way comprehensive, and it's quite tough to add a second one.

Our options are to either say, "well, that's the way it is" or strategically target questions with less than 3 answers and add an answer if we haven't already (or, I guess, a second answer if you've already answered it once).

Granted, this isn't StackOverflow where there are 4^7 different programmatic solutions to concatenating Strings and everyone wants their say, so we do have that to consider.

Follow-up questions for thought:

  • Should this be brought to the forefront with the go-live evaluation committee?
  • Or is it something they've already taken into consideration?
  • Are the Area51 stats unrealistic for a site like this?
  • Is this possibly an aspect of having a small user group and the situation will remedy itself with the recently obvious growth?

That being said, I'm actively following the "add an answer" tactic; here are four results of that recent effort:

Source Link
JoshDM
  • 9k
  • 12
  • 19

Well, here's the thing: some of these solo answers are way comprehensive, and it's quite tough to add a second one.

Our options are to either say, "well, that's the way it is" or strategically target questions with less than 3 answers and add an answer if we haven't already (or, I guess, a second answer if you've already answered it once).

Granted, this isn't StackOverflow where there are 4^7 different programmatic solutions to concatenating Strings and everyone wants their say, so we do have that to consider.

Follow-up questions for thought:

  • Should this be brought to the forefront with the go-live evaluation committee?
  • Or is it something they've already taken into consideration?
  • Are the Area51 stats unrealistic for a site like this?
  • Is this possibly an aspect of having a small user group and the situation will remedy itself with the recently obvious growth?