Skip to main content
Pets Meta

Return to Answer

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
lila
lila
  • 210
  • 5
  • 11

I am sorry for you to have had this experience, but please.

Please be patient while waiting for your flags to be handled. It's not that they had been ignored, please take into account that Pets is a relatively small site with only 4 moderators and it could take a while for the flags to have been processed in case of none of moderators being online, up to several hours actually in some cases. I have acted immediately after noticing both your flags and this post, but at the time it happened I was in the bathroom ^.^

All the comments have been moved to chat. In my opinion some, but not all of them, were indeed directly harrassing or unkind, and I marked your reports accordingly as helpful/declined. But yes, they all were irrelevant to the essence of question being asked and not constructive.

It's not really that common for such discussions to happen in the comments in my experience, but they sometimes do. Cats endangering local fauna is in my observation the most "popular" of these polarizing topics that have a great potential for stirring up unneeded drama. I cannot really attribute malice to the participants of such violent discussions, even though such arguments are definitely unwelcome there; we are all pet and animal lovers there after all, and we deeply care about their well-being, and thus we are sensitive about certain subjects.

I am sorry for you to have had this experience, but please be patient while waiting for your flags to be handled. It's not that they had been ignored, please take into account that Pets is a relatively small site with only 4 moderators and it could take a while for the flags to have been processed in case of none of moderators being online, up to several hours actually in some cases. I have acted immediately after noticing both your flags and this post, but at the time it happened I was in the bathroom ^.^

All the comments have been moved to chat. In my opinion some, but not all of them, were indeed directly harrassing or unkind, and I marked your reports accordingly as helpful/declined. But yes, they all were irrelevant to the essence of question being asked and not constructive.

It's not really that common for such discussions to happen in the comments in my experience, but they sometimes do. Cats endangering local fauna is in my observation the most "popular" of these polarizing topics that have a great potential for stirring up unneeded drama. I cannot really attribute malice to the participants of such violent discussions, even though such arguments are definitely unwelcome there; we are all pet and animal lovers there after all, and we deeply care about their well-being, and thus we are sensitive about certain subjects.

I am sorry for you to have had this experience.

Please be patient while waiting for your flags to be handled. It's not that they had been ignored, please take into account that Pets is a relatively small site with only 4 moderators and it could take a while for the flags to have been processed in case of none of moderators being online, up to several hours actually in some cases. I have acted immediately after noticing both your flags and this post, but at the time it happened I was in the bathroom ^.^

All the comments have been moved to chat. In my opinion some, but not all of them, were indeed directly harrassing or unkind, and I marked your reports accordingly as helpful/declined. But yes, they all were irrelevant to the essence of question being asked and not constructive.

It's not really that common for such discussions to happen in the comments in my experience, but they sometimes do. Cats endangering local fauna is in my observation the most "popular" of these polarizing topics that have a great potential for stirring up unneeded drama. I cannot really attribute malice to the participants of such violent discussions, even though such arguments are definitely unwelcome there; we are all pet and animal lovers there after all, and we deeply care about their well-being, and thus we are sensitive about certain subjects.

Source Link
lila
lila
  • 210
  • 5
  • 11

I am sorry for you to have had this experience, but please be patient while waiting for your flags to be handled. It's not that they had been ignored, please take into account that Pets is a relatively small site with only 4 moderators and it could take a while for the flags to have been processed in case of none of moderators being online, up to several hours actually in some cases. I have acted immediately after noticing both your flags and this post, but at the time it happened I was in the bathroom ^.^

All the comments have been moved to chat. In my opinion some, but not all of them, were indeed directly harrassing or unkind, and I marked your reports accordingly as helpful/declined. But yes, they all were irrelevant to the essence of question being asked and not constructive.

It's not really that common for such discussions to happen in the comments in my experience, but they sometimes do. Cats endangering local fauna is in my observation the most "popular" of these polarizing topics that have a great potential for stirring up unneeded drama. I cannot really attribute malice to the participants of such violent discussions, even though such arguments are definitely unwelcome there; we are all pet and animal lovers there after all, and we deeply care about their well-being, and thus we are sensitive about certain subjects.