I'd like to license my creative works that are not code (including the project's documentation) under a license that is like the MIT license, but does apply to non-code. The CC BY is too big to fit anywhere (if modified) and has extra clauses about termination and DRM and other stuff I'm not comfortable with, while the CC0 obviously doesn't cover attribution and is also long if I were to modify and include it anywhere. Crude modification of the MIT license to show what I mean:
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this creative work (the "Work"), to deal in the Work without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Work, and to permit persons to whom the Work is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Work.
THE WORK IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE WORK.
I DO NOT intend to use this! What I mean is I'm looking for a well-established license that's basically equivalent to this, and the CC0 happens to be too permissive, while the CC-BY happens to be too restrictive.