It appears to be a typo in that RFC. Notice that the header of the RFC says Errata Exist
. It is not uncommon for things like that to happen.
That particular error is corrected in the errata. See the RFC Editor for the details.
Errata ID: 3485
Status: Verified
Type: TechnicalReported By: Markus Falb
Date Reported: 2013-02-18
Verifier Name: RonBonica
Date Verified: 2013-02-18Section 2 says:
three classes of networks: Class A (most significant address bits '00'), with 128 possible networks each and 16777216 end systems
<
It should say:three classes of networks: Class A (most significant address bit '0'), with 128 possible networks each and 16777216 end systems
<
Notes:MSB bits ’00’ would mean that only 6 bits are available for the network part and this would mean only 64 CLASS A networks.