Timeline for Should we explicitly include “piece recommendations” as a close reasons?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14 at 6:02 | comment | added | user1079505 | @ToddWilcox I agree that the recommendations for repertoire should remain off-topic. I'm arguing however that they don't fit the justification mentioned by Aaron. | |
| Mar 14 at 5:53 | comment | added | Todd Wilcox | @user1079505 The help center clarifies that recommendations for rep are off-topic. If you think they should be on-topic, that's a separate meta question to bring that up for discussion and potentially changing the help center. As recommendations for rep are currently off topic, this meta question is about whether and how do we clarify that they are off topic in close reasons. Or maybe I don't understand your comment? | |
| Mar 14 at 4:49 | comment | added | user1079505 | This doesn't belong here. A recommendation for repertoire might very well be useful for future readers, and the reasons why we don't want such recommendations are different (opinion based, and potential for spam/advertising). | |
| Mar 14 at 4:17 | history | answered | Aaron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |