Timeline for Can a duplicate question notice be an answer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 9:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Sep 3, 2015 at 4:02 | answer | added | Dessa Simpson | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 23:39 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | I tended to do this when it seems similar enough, but I'm not entirely sure if its a dupe. OP would then have the option of editing his question to differenciate it or the question could be closed. | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 12:34 | answer | added | Oliver Salzburg | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 11:37 | comment | added | Psycogeek | And if it is not a duplicate, then the questioner had better say something before it gets marked that way. Once fully marked as a dupe, people are not likely to add content to that, instead they would add thier content to the linked original, rendering the duplicate question EOL. | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 11:17 | comment | added | slhck | Hmm. The idea of the "duplicate question" comments is that they'll eventually end up as official links to a duplicate question, embedded within the post, or are self-deleted by the author (or flagged as obsolete) if the OP can show that the question in fact is not a duplicate. | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 10:54 | history | asked | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |