Timeline for DROP [columns] FROM tags;
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2015 at 17:05 | history | edited | MokubaiMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 17, 2015 at 3:23 | vote | accept | Excellll | ||
| Jun 17, 2015 at 3:23 | answer | added | Excellll | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 4:08 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 7, 2015 at 2:46 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/563891587097579522 | ||
| Feb 6, 2015 at 21:34 | history | edited | Excellll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed awkward agreement
|
| Feb 6, 2015 at 8:01 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Our Excel experts seem to generally have comprehensive knowledge, and text editors don't have many functions. For those two, [columns] isn't needed to attract the right people for answers. Word users tend to have more specialized experience, and issues dealing with page layout or tables are somewhat "specialties" that could benefit from having a tag. [columns] is a bit meta. [table] has been deprecated. For Word, rather than simply drop the [columns] tag, it might be better to replace it with a subject tag in some cases. At least for some of these, [page-layout] might be good. | |
| Feb 5, 2015 at 17:36 | comment | added | allquixotic | A tag-cleanup-request with an already witty title? Oh me oh my, what am I going to do?! (Edit: Except upvote it..........) | |
| Feb 5, 2015 at 16:58 | comment | added | Raystafarian | +1. I feel like we did this at least once already though. Can't find anything though. | |
| Feb 5, 2015 at 16:54 | history | asked | Excellll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |