Timeline for Raise the minimum rep needed to create new tags
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 9:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 9:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Sep 26, 2014 at 18:14 | history | edited | gparyani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
[Edit removed during grace period]
|
| Sep 4, 2014 at 5:58 | history | edited | gparyani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 545 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2014 at 23:04 | history | edited | gparyani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 510 characters in body
|
| Jul 16, 2014 at 18:56 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 15, 2014 at 18:21 | history | edited | gparyani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
[Edit removed during grace period]
|
| Jul 12, 2014 at 4:22 | comment | added | user3459110 | @damryfbfnetsi No post on meta. So yes.... own review queue? :P | |
| Jul 10, 2014 at 14:44 | comment | added | gparyani | @AwalGarg So you think that an inline feature should become its own review queue or should it post on Meta? | |
| Jul 10, 2014 at 13:27 | comment | added | user3459110 | @shub Excellent. That way, mod can see what the creator is aiming at... +1 | |
| Jul 10, 2014 at 10:43 | comment | added | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | @AwalGarg And the 'creator' could have a shot at creating the tag wiki for the tag as well...? | |
| Jul 10, 2014 at 8:53 | comment | added | user3459110 | Or just introduce a "request-tag" feature inline of asking/editing questions for users with 300 and above rep? Mods/10k/20k/trusted users will take a look at them. It will be a more universal gesture (I mean, StackExchange-Versal) | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 6:55 | comment | added | Robotnik | 1.5k is fair. If someone's made it to 1.5 on a SE site as big as SU, they've obviously invested in the site. | |
| Jul 4, 2014 at 21:37 | history | edited | gparyani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 267 characters in body
|
| Jun 28, 2014 at 17:10 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/482934124161028099 | ||
| Jun 28, 2014 at 15:11 | history | edited | gparyani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jun 28, 2014 at 15:06 | history | edited | gparyani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 144 characters in body
|
| Jun 28, 2014 at 11:39 | comment | added | Art Gertner | Make it 10K. If someone with lower rep comes up with a good tag to add, there is always an option to discuss it on Meta. | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 20:32 | history | edited | gparyani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 122 characters in body
|
| Jun 27, 2014 at 17:09 | comment | added | gparyani | @CanadianLuke Maybe a little too much. I think that it should be 1500 like on Stack Overflow. | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 16:32 | comment | added | Canadian Luke | 10K? Sounds good to me | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 8:20 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg | I strongly support this and would want the limit to be as high as possible. | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 6:45 | comment | added | slhck |
Absolutely supported. Just from the latest newest tags added to the system I had to remove [non-printable], [insertion-loss], and [delegation]. People should understand that new tags they add don't help others find their question faster if those tags don't address any experts in a certain field.
|
|
| Jun 27, 2014 at 5:49 | history | asked | gparyani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |