Timeline for Help us clean up tags!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2018 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user | ||
| Mar 17, 2017 at 8:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 8:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Aug 30, 2014 at 0:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
|
|
| Aug 29, 2014 at 18:48 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg | @damryfbfnetsi misused tags will be synonymized with proper tags after cleanup | |
| Aug 29, 2014 at 18:21 | comment | added | gparyani | What steps should we take to help stop future misuse (other than a tag wiki)? | |
| Aug 29, 2014 at 18:06 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg | @damryfbfnetsi they need to be cleaned up and retagged appropriately | |
| Aug 29, 2014 at 17:32 | comment | added | gparyani | What about tags that are defined to mean one thing, but can be interpreted to mean another thing, and are frequently misused to mean the other thing? Should we post such semi-tag cleanup requests? (e.g. ide really means Integrated Development Environments, not IDE hard drive (PATA)) | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 18:00 | comment | added | Edward J Beckett | I suggested we add object qualification for transitive verbs... meta.superuser.com/questions/8292/… | |
| Jul 28, 2014 at 18:26 | history | edited | slhck |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 26, 2014 at 22:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
|
|
| Jun 30, 2014 at 19:05 | history | edited | Oliver Salzburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2014 at 19:00 | history | edited | Oliver Salzburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Jun 27, 2014 at 20:56 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg | @Braiam There is a question about that tag on meta already though meta.superuser.com/questions/8153/replace-the-surface-tag | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 20:55 | comment | added | Braiam | Ok, I did for the [ [surface] tag](meta.superuser.com/q/8153/235569) since it was just 3 poor question put out of pain (and it seems pretty obvious they wanted the microsoft-surface tag). | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 20:47 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg | @Braiam No. The edits will either go through the suggested edit review process or you are already trusted enough to make edits as you see fit. Just don't let the mods catch you deleting some beloved tag ;D | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 20:37 | comment | added | Braiam | What about the accidentally created tags that has low (say less than 5) count and there's already an obvious tag on the same topic, do we need to post a meatQ asking for clearance? | |
| Jun 26, 2014 at 18:44 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 26, 2014 at 18:41 | history | asked | Oliver Salzburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |