Timeline for System should teach users more by asking questions and showing FAQs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jan 8, 2013 at 17:51 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 3, 2013 at 16:48 | history | edited | James Mertz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Jan 2, 2013 at 18:27 | answer | added | Tamara Wijsman | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 14:09 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | @slhck Shown when posting (first) answer, linking to this page (tips on writing great answers) and this page (advanced help). | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 12:32 | comment | added | slhck | I don't know. I found active reviewing much more responsive when it comes to all the things one could do wrong—of which there are plenty. There are a lot of helpful messages next to the ask question box and when editing posts already. I could imagine something similar for answering, where there's currently nothing IIRC. I also like the idea of a sort of "tip of the day". | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 11:56 | comment | added | nixda | I see the point with "out of context". Some points to reply to that. 1) Show related FAQ. If someone edited 10 times maybe he want to know if there are some secret formatting goodies. 2) He shouldn't be forced to answer or read. A single click would dismiss it. Its only a chance to get some rep or badge. 3) No negative reputation for wrong answers. --- Of course this requires a lot of work and its hardly conceivable. But in a what-if assumption: What would you enhance? | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 11:21 | history | edited | nixda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 32 characters in body
|
| Jan 2, 2013 at 10:12 | comment | added | slhck | I like your ideas, but I'm afraid the effort required to create this wouldn't pay off: It has been shown that out of context messages are often simply ignored (and "out of context" means that the person doesn't want to see this message at that point). If someone were interested in knowing more, they'd look it up, ask others here or in chat, et cetera. I believe we merely have to act on cases where we see people doing something wrong. | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 10:09 | comment | added | slhck | > I'm too lazy to do a search for FAQ or click the FAQ link on the right. – unfortunately, putting a wall of text in front of you isn't going to make this better. We have a site that explains How to Answer. You wouldn't believe how often that is skipped and ignored, and that's the first thing some will see. And it's not even a lot of text. | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 5:53 | comment | added | soandos | also rep is not awarded for any moderation activity | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 5:32 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | Just to note that the win image thing is a 'hack' - its not a 'standard' way of using the keyboard tag. And duplicates are often shown on the side. | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 5:12 | history | asked | nixda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
