Timeline for What can we do to keep this site civil / professional / work safe?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jul 3, 2012 at 16:43 | comment | added | jsj | @TRiG The word was "clit", as in clitoris. Which is definitely not an offensive word - it's just a body part. | |
| Jun 28, 2012 at 21:01 | comment | added | TRiG | @Shinrai. My point was actually only partly about the "strength" of language. Mainly, I was making a geeky grammar point. Nipple is a noun. Bother is an expletive. | |
| Jun 28, 2012 at 18:05 | comment | added | Shinrai | @TRiG - After the fact, but I just stumbled onto this. I haven't actually read the stuff in question, but I'm assuming the term in question is stronger than 'nipple'. (And if I remember this XKCD correctly, but I have heard it elsewhere). | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 17:01 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @TRiG: That's was what I wanted to see discussed, nobody said explicitly it was. | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 15:45 | comment | added | TRiG | Since when has nipple been an expletive? | |
| Jun 19, 2012 at 20:36 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | Thanks Shog9 for confirming. Sorry, DMA, it's indeed not a legal issue. +1 | |
| Jun 19, 2012 at 18:06 | history | answered | DMA57361 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |