Timeline for Duplicate Titles needing improvement and/or closed as duplicate
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Sep 14, 2011 at 18:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSuper_User/status/114042837523369984 | ||
| Aug 31, 2011 at 19:10 | answer | added | Simon Sheehan | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 31, 2011 at 17:58 | comment | added | nhinkle | @SimonSheehan yes it can still be merged. But again, we'd only merge if they really are 99.999% the same. This happens pretty rarely in practice. Some duplication is OK. | |
| Aug 31, 2011 at 17:56 | comment | added | Simon Sheehan | @nhinkle What if it is a duplicate but both have accepted answers? Can it be merged still? | |
| Aug 31, 2011 at 17:55 | comment | added | nhinkle | @SimonSheehan and Paulo, I added some info about how this can be handled so as not to overwhelm the flag list. Thanks for your help! | |
| Aug 31, 2011 at 17:54 | history | edited | nhinkle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added a moderator note with info about how to handle these questions
|
| Aug 31, 2011 at 17:45 | comment | added | Paŭlo Ebermann | Ah, I thought of merging being a follow-up to closing. I added some mention of it to the question. | |
| Aug 31, 2011 at 17:45 | history | edited | Paŭlo Ebermann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
mention merging
|
| Aug 31, 2011 at 17:42 | comment | added | Simon Sheehan | Some of these could also be merged i think. | |
| Aug 31, 2011 at 17:35 | history | asked | Paŭlo Ebermann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |