Timeline for How should we act upon "Install OS X as virtual machine" questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2012 at 0:19 | comment | added | Mechanical snail | I'm not sure we should even ban non-Apple-hardware questions, which would differ from policy on a very similar case decided on Meta SO. See my answer below. | |
| Nov 26, 2011 at 17:36 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | Oops -- sorry about that, didn't see that introduction. | |
| Nov 26, 2011 at 17:31 | comment | added | slhck | @DanielBeck > … that for non-Server versions (unaccepted in the meantime, but maybe you know more?) | |
| Nov 26, 2011 at 15:47 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | I don't think this is a good idea. 10.6 server can legally be virtualised. | |
| Sep 20, 2011 at 11:45 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
more concrete explanation
|
| Sep 1, 2011 at 7:59 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 172 characters in body
|
| Jul 9, 2011 at 4:12 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
| Jul 9, 2011 at 4:12 | comment | added | slhck | No, this is for consumer only. | |
| Jul 8, 2011 at 20:53 | comment | added | Snow_Mac | Just for server or for consumer as well? | |
| Jul 7, 2011 at 7:36 | vote | accept | slhck | ||
| Nov 26, 2011 at 17:32 | |||||
| Jul 7, 2011 at 7:36 | history | answered | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |