Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2020 at 10:03 comment added Andrew T. @DanielB mod votes are always binding. It is something that the mods have asked but declined by SE.
Apr 13, 2020 at 3:39 comment added NVZ Is it just or is the items 3 and 4 missing in the question!? Can't find 3 and 4 here.
Apr 12, 2020 at 12:28 comment added NVZ @DanielB Mod votes on close/reopen/delete etc. are enough to trigger the action without waiting for other users' votes.
Apr 12, 2020 at 10:29 comment added Daniel B So, this question has occured to me again and again: Can moderators close-vote “normally”? Or do their votes always close the question immediately?
Apr 8, 2020 at 5:35 comment added Ramhound @FranckDernoncourt - What happened exactly? Care to provide specifics?
Apr 7, 2020 at 6:00 comment added Franck Dernoncourt Happened quite a few times to me.
Apr 7, 2020 at 0:02 comment added Ramhound @Andre - The question being deleted has little to do with the downvotes. So was your example deleted by the community or self-deleted?
Apr 6, 2020 at 18:00 history tweeted twitter.com/super_user/status/1247222759052267523
Apr 6, 2020 at 13:37 comment added OverLordGoldDragon @DavidPostill I referred to SO as an example, the post itself was applied to SU. You only confirm my criticism by deleting my post that literally mentions moderators deleting my critical posts.
Apr 6, 2020 at 13:25 comment added andre_ss6 I've seen this happen many times and recently again with this question (stackoverflow.com/questions/60234816/…) and it was closed as a recommendation question, which I heavily disagree. Eventually I decided to take it to Meta and managed to get it reopened, but the discussion spiraled out of control (because I raised this same issue as the OP's here on the same Meta question) and people started mass downvoting the question, eventually leading to its deletion.
Apr 6, 2020 at 0:04 comment added DavidPostill Mod @Hashim Your questions get closed because they are not (initially at least) a good fit to the standards for SU that have been decided by the community (not the moderators). Nevertheless you consistently keep trying without apparently learning from what you are told.
Apr 6, 2020 at 0:03 comment added DavidPostill Mod @Hashim If you read through the responses and comments to your many meta questions about your own questions you will see explanations from many other long time users who are not moderators but give exactly the same reasons and explanations as to why your questions were closed.
Apr 5, 2020 at 19:25 answer added Ramhound timeline score: 10
Apr 5, 2020 at 18:20 comment added Hashim Aziz I posted most of the same sentiments a few weeks ago, for my own posts, regarding the same moderator, and was met with downvotes and a two-line answer from another moderator handwaving the issue away. For that matter, I've been posting these sentiments on this meta over the last few years. What else is to be expected, the moderators are good friends and there's no independent process to hold them to standards of any sort. This community isn't what it used to be, not even for such basic things as consistency, and there are much better places that I'd rather dedicate the majority of my time to.
Apr 5, 2020 at 8:10 comment added DavidPostill Mod @JourneymanGeek looking at the source - 3 (superuser.com/a/1530286/1686) is a comment not an answer. 4 (meta.superuser.com/questions/14007/…) is a meta question re a question that was subsequently reopened after editing (it was asking for software)
Apr 5, 2020 at 0:58 comment added Journeyman Geek Mod .... What happened to 3 and 4?
Apr 5, 2020 at 0:50 comment added grawity_u1686 You might be completely right, yes.
Apr 5, 2020 at 0:24 comment added Journeyman Geek Mod with respect to 1 and 2 Both these questions seem incredibly low quality to me - so after the fact, it makes for 2 moderators. 5... eh I'd say making a case for it to be reopened wouldn't be out of line. 6 - kinda shows a lack of research? .
Apr 4, 2020 at 22:30 history asked grawity_u1686 CC BY-SA 4.0