Timeline for Should [clock] be split up into 3 tags?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2018 at 15:00 | comment | added | Mureinik | @JeffreyBosboom as in "the time displayed on your computer?" | |
| Jul 13, 2018 at 13:00 | comment | added | mattdm | "real time" has implications of RTOS that probably aren't intended. "wall-clock"? :) | |
| Jul 8, 2018 at 14:04 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/1015959703380217857 | ||
| Jul 8, 2018 at 3:20 | comment | added | Jeffrey Bosboom | Drive-by suggestion from an outsider: how about [real-time-clock] for clocks that keep human time? [computer-clock] makes me think of CPU/memory/etc clock speeds. | |
| Jul 5, 2018 at 0:42 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Additional thoughts: 1) if we have an issue with [clock] being ambiguous, we should not keep it as-is and rely on wiki excerpt guidance. 1st bullet: definitely remove redundant [clock] tags. 2nd bullet: replace it with [computer-clock]. 2) [cpu-clock-speed] is too restrictive, excluding other possible questions relating to the cpu clock. Just use [cpu-clock] for all questions pertaining to it. | |
| Jul 4, 2018 at 23:42 | history | edited | Zackary | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed title, suggested tag synonyms for cpu-clock
|
| Jul 4, 2018 at 0:59 | comment | added | fixer1234 | I agree it's too broad. [timestamp] has a definition that associates it with an event time. Questions about time of day that aren't about a timestamp might be a better match with [date-time]. [computer-clock] might still be misused (like for [cpu-clock]), but I can't think of a better tag. Other than those nits, I like it. | |
| Jul 3, 2018 at 22:30 | comment | added | Hennes | [CPU-clock]. Oh how have times progressed. That did not use to be on the CPU back when I still needed to walk uphils both way, to school and back home. :) | |
| Jul 3, 2018 at 22:14 | history | asked | Zackary | CC BY-SA 4.0 |