Timeline for Is [numbering] tag useful or too vague?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24 at 17:50 | comment | added | Slate StaffMod | Hey folks, I've removed [status-planned] from this post. It looks like there might still be work to do here, and I'd encourage you to follow through with it. If staff assistance is required, please help us out by making it clear what we should do, then flagging the post to be retagged [status-review]. | |
| Jun 24 at 17:50 | history | edited | SlateStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| May 19, 2017 at 13:34 | comment | added | djsmiley2kStaysInside | You could say.... it's numbers up! | |
| May 19, 2017 at 0:56 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/865370471092674561 | ||
| May 18, 2017 at 7:23 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | It's only use is when combined with another more useful tag, such as microsoft-word, to properly define what you are numbering. As such it is a meta-tag and should be removed. | |
| May 18, 2017 at 7:21 | history | edited | MokubaiMod |
edited tags
|
|
| May 18, 2017 at 1:42 | comment | added | Chindraba | I can't think of a use for that tag, outside of a document-centric site, and maybe not even then. | |
| May 17, 2017 at 22:23 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| May 17, 2017 at 21:58 | answer | added | Excellll | timeline score: 15 | |
| May 17, 2017 at 21:35 | history | asked | K.A.Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |