Timeline for Logistics for Cleanup Weekend 2
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2019 at 20:29 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 17, 2018 at 14:56 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 16, 2017 at 15:22 | comment | added | djsmiley2kStaysInside | I'm still slowly removing old 'delete' tags.... I try not to flood the queue at @DavidPostill's request ;) | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 8:27 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 9, 2017 at 19:20 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | @fixer1234 Not that I know of (I've done over 100 edit reviews today) :/ | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 19:00 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Enlisting the support of <2K users creates massive edit review requirements. Many higher-rep users have maxed out their limit of 20 reviews/day, leaving a ridiculous workload for you mods. Is there a way to temporarily raise the review limit for regular users so we can assist? | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 10:26 | comment | added | Chindraba | @Twisty rather than bouncing comments here, why not join us in the SU chat room RootAccess? chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/118/root-access | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 10:23 | comment | added | Chindraba | @Twisty That's ok, now you can fix the fix. dd should be lower case because it is a *nix command, not an abbreviation. | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 10:19 | comment | added | Chindraba | Take two to reject anyway, and I have been a bit lax in reviewing them. The ones that slap me in the face get fixed anyway. It's all for the good, so just keep plugging on. @Twisty What I've seen others do sometimes is to edit the edit. Don't know how they do that, but it fixes the problem they see, and gets it approved faster as well. | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 10:14 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | @Twisty Approving just tag edits is fine. There are many hundreds to do so we are not being too picky. If someone fixes other issues then that is a bounus. | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 10:11 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | Do those reviewing Suggested Edits need to be as strict about requiring editors to fix all/most errors in a post when doing tag cleanup? Or should we be approving edits that only fix the tags and leave other things undone? | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 6:41 | comment | added | Chindraba | Image cleanup status update: One post has an historical lock on it, that will require high-rep/mod attention. One has posted videos that are no longer available. One post Links to a deleted Stack Overflow question, but has no image left in it to explain the partitioning in question - maybe a mod to mod between sites can rescue that image and apply it to the Super User posting. Finally, 51 posts are listed under User screenshot no longer available, and their final status will have to be considered case-by-case as many don't make any sense without the image to explain the issue. | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 2:16 | comment | added | Chindraba | It seems that the status "Image no longer available" is not always accurate. I have found some that were available that said they were not. Please recheck the availability before making major edits to remove the images completely. | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 10:31 | comment | added | Chindraba | In the status column User screenshot no longer available refers to a missing image created by the OP that is usually integral to the post, and its absence may make the post unclear, or useless. Repairing those posts will be difficult anyone other than the OP. The Image no longer available is probably some image the OP found elsewhere, that may not be as critical to the post. Product images, things pulled from old tutorials, etc., are likely candidates for the second option. Those posts may be easier to salvage without the OP's help. | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 9:39 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 125 characters in body
|
| Apr 4, 2017 at 5:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/849127361719259136 | ||
| Apr 3, 2017 at 18:55 | comment | added | music2myear | Lovin' that new diamond by your name! | |
| Apr 3, 2017 at 17:15 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Apr 3, 2017 at 15:57 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 3, 2017 at 15:35 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Apr 3, 2017 at 15:12 | history | undeleted | DavidPostillMod | ||
| Apr 3, 2017 at 15:12 | history | edited | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 354 characters in body; edited title
|
| Apr 3, 2017 at 14:58 | history | deleted | DavidPostillMod | via Vote | |
| Apr 3, 2017 at 14:53 | history | asked | DavidPostillMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |