Timeline for Why have the review audits not been fixed? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Oct 28, 2016 at 7:09 | history | closed | MokubaiMod | Duplicate of Mechanism for scrapping bad audit questions? | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 23:45 | comment | added | End Antisemitic Hate | @fixer1234 Another assumption is that the price of a totally automated system is some percentage of audit questions will be bad. That's a good point. I didn't know it was totally automated. Regarding adrenaline... no. | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 20:08 | answer | added | MokubaiMod | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 6:46 | comment | added | fixer1234 | The audit isn't testing whether people are investigating that far. The system just picks random deleted questions for audits. The assumption is that if people found whatever the problem is the first time around, people can find it again. Another assumption is that the price of a totally automated system is some percentage of audit questions will be bad. So failures have to exceed a threshold before the system calls a time out. The purpose is to keep reviewers alert, and the frustration of failing occasional bad questions makes reviewers more alert. This got your adrenalin up, didn't it? | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 5:40 | history | asked | End Antisemitic Hate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |