Timeline for Can red flags on discussions nuke posts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10 at 14:54 | history | rollback | TylerH |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| Apr 10 at 14:54 | history | rollback | TylerH |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Apr 10 at 14:38 | history | edited | Wicket |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 23 at 16:58 | vote | accept | Fastnlight | ||
| Jan 23 at 7:22 | history | edited | BertholdStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 13, 2023 at 22:20 | answer | added | BertholdStaffMod | timeline score: 25 | |
| Dec 13, 2023 at 22:16 | history | edited | BertholdStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 13, 2023 at 21:02 | comment | added | Fastnlight | It's like building a large city (discussions), and implementing a small police force (CMs). They can't be everywhere at once, so you let people report crime (flags). Then you let people say what the crime was (flag reasons). Now, we need to be able to perform a citizens arrest (red flags), as the crime is getting out of hand. | |
| Dec 13, 2023 at 20:58 | comment | added | user4581301 | Baby steps, people. Baby steps. But soon. SOON! We shall RULE THE WORLD! Or maybe nuke spam quickly and efficiently. I'll settle for that. FOR NOW! | |
| Dec 13, 2023 at 19:25 | comment | added | Spevacus | I implore you to just imagine my joy when I was able to indicate that "1-800-SPAM-SITE please visit my garbage website" was, infact, spam, but it didn't actually do anything, because the difference between flagging a discussion as "spam" and, as previous, without a reason at all, is zero. | |
| Dec 13, 2023 at 19:23 | history | asked | Fastnlight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |