Timeline for Let's stop tag wiki plagiarism
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 31, 2015 at 23:35 | comment | added | artless noise | @undo I know it is work to implement this and thanks for the link to your post. I guess that when you can show having this type of entry gives many benefits instead of just one, it is more likely to be done. I do think that rewarding a reviewer for finding plagiarism is better than punishing people for not seeing it. | |
| Dec 31, 2015 at 16:56 | comment | added | artless noise | @Zizouz212 I was not suggesting solely for how to use a tag, but there should be information on how to use a tag... I said main content; in the OPs example, there is nothing about tags at all (also a strong indicator that it is could be copied from somewhere). | |
| Dec 30, 2015 at 20:22 | comment | added | Zizouz212 | This is just wrong. Tag wikis aren't solely for how to use a tag, but they are for what the topic of the tag is about. Guidance on how to use a tag belongs in the excerpt. Quoting is not, and should never be an issue. Tag wikis aren't a full-out article, but they should have enough information to answer What is [tag]?, where is [tag] used? What's cool about [tag]? and so on. | |
| Dec 30, 2015 at 16:52 | comment | added | Undo Mod | I suggested something somewhat similar a while back: meta.stackexchange.com/a/201884/215468, but that requires a structural change (read: developer time), and thus is less likely to be implemented than a policy. I'd much rather have this built into the system as you suggest, though. | |
| Dec 30, 2015 at 16:49 | history | answered | artless noise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |