Skip to main content
minor typo correction
Source Link
gnat
  • 6.2k
  • 10
  • 108
  • 176

I don’t think rep is the correct way to drive this.

We know from the close review queue the users that tenttend to act in a way that is consistent with how other users review the same item.

Using some simple stats it would be possible to work out the set of users that if they were given a “binding close/leave open” vote, then the outcome would not change in 99% of the time. I don’t know how large this set would be. Assuming it is greater than 0, these uses could be given double “power” on their review actions.

I don’t think rep is the correct way to drive this.

We know from the close review queue the users that tent to act in a way that is consistent with how other users review the same item.

Using some simple stats it would be possible to work out the set of users that if they were given a “binding close/leave open” vote, then the outcome would not change in 99% of the time. I don’t know how large this set would be. Assuming it is greater than 0, these uses could be given double “power” on their review actions.

I don’t think rep is the correct way to drive this.

We know from the close review queue the users that tend to act in a way that is consistent with how other users review the same item.

Using some simple stats it would be possible to work out the set of users that if they were given a “binding close/leave open” vote, then the outcome would not change in 99% of the time. I don’t know how large this set would be. Assuming it is greater than 0, these uses could be given double “power” on their review actions.

Source Link
Ian Ringrose
  • 51.7k
  • 1
  • 32
  • 37

I don’t think rep is the correct way to drive this.

We know from the close review queue the users that tent to act in a way that is consistent with how other users review the same item.

Using some simple stats it would be possible to work out the set of users that if they were given a “binding close/leave open” vote, then the outcome would not change in 99% of the time. I don’t know how large this set would be. Assuming it is greater than 0, these uses could be given double “power” on their review actions.