Skip to main content
added 56 characters in body
Source Link
Kermit
  • 34k
  • 1
  • 17
  • 14

Though this question specifically discusses high-rep users, I would not feel comfortable having my vote be binding. Instead, I would propose a tiered close vote system since close votes can be cast beginning with 3,000 reputation. This would also remove the tag or downvote requirement.

Reputation   Close vote weight
3,000        1.0
10,000       1.5
20,000       2.5

These are completely made up and for illustrative purposes

The minimum vote "count" could still remain at 5, but a combination of these users could satisfy a close:

1 @ 3,000  (1.0)
1 @ 10,000 (1.5)
1 @ 20,000 (2.5)
           -----
            5.0

Or

2 @ 20,000 (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Or

5 @ 3,000  (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Though this question specifically discusses high-rep users, I would not feel comfortable having my vote be binding. Instead, I would propose a tiered close vote system since close votes can be cast beginning with 3,000 reputation.

Reputation   Close vote weight
3,000        1.0
10,000       1.5
20,000       2.5

These are completely made up and for illustrative purposes

The minimum vote "count" could still remain at 5, but a combination of these users could satisfy a close:

1 @ 3,000  (1.0)
1 @ 10,000 (1.5)
1 @ 20,000 (2.5)
           -----
            5.0

Or

2 @ 20,000 (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Or

5 @ 3,000  (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Though this question specifically discusses high-rep users, I would not feel comfortable having my vote be binding. Instead, I would propose a tiered close vote system since close votes can be cast beginning with 3,000 reputation. This would also remove the tag or downvote requirement.

Reputation   Close vote weight
3,000        1.0
10,000       1.5
20,000       2.5

These are completely made up and for illustrative purposes

The minimum vote "count" could still remain at 5, but a combination of these users could satisfy a close:

1 @ 3,000  (1.0)
1 @ 10,000 (1.5)
1 @ 20,000 (2.5)
           -----
            5.0

Or

2 @ 20,000 (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Or

5 @ 3,000  (5.0)
           -----
            5.0
people can't understand what illustrative means
Source Link
Kermit
  • 34k
  • 1
  • 17
  • 14

Though this question specifically discusses high-rep users, I would not feel comfortable having my vote be binding. Instead, I would propose a tiered close vote system since close votes can be cast beginning with 3,000 reputation.

Reputation   Close vote weight
3,000        01.50
10,000       1.05
20,000       2.5

These are completely made up and for illustrative purposes

The minimum vote "count" could still remain at 5, but a combination of these users could satisfy a close:

1 @ 3,000  (01.50)
21 @ 10,000 (21.05)
1 @ 20,000 (2.5)
           -----
            5.0

Or

2 @ 20,000 (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Or

5 @ 103,000  (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Though this question specifically discusses high-rep users, I would not feel comfortable having my vote be binding. Instead, I would propose a tiered close vote system since close votes can be cast beginning with 3,000 reputation.

Reputation   Close vote weight
3,000        0.5
10,000       1.0
20,000       2.5

These are completely made up and for illustrative purposes

The minimum vote "count" could still remain at 5, but a combination of these users could satisfy a close:

1 @ 3,000  (0.5)
2 @ 10,000 (2.0)
1 @ 20,000 (2.5)
           -----
            5.0

Or

2 @ 20,000 (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Or

5 @ 10,000 (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Though this question specifically discusses high-rep users, I would not feel comfortable having my vote be binding. Instead, I would propose a tiered close vote system since close votes can be cast beginning with 3,000 reputation.

Reputation   Close vote weight
3,000        1.0
10,000       1.5
20,000       2.5

These are completely made up and for illustrative purposes

The minimum vote "count" could still remain at 5, but a combination of these users could satisfy a close:

1 @ 3,000  (1.0)
1 @ 10,000 (1.5)
1 @ 20,000 (2.5)
           -----
            5.0

Or

2 @ 20,000 (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Or

5 @ 3,000  (5.0)
           -----
            5.0
Source Link
Kermit
  • 34k
  • 1
  • 17
  • 14

Though this question specifically discusses high-rep users, I would not feel comfortable having my vote be binding. Instead, I would propose a tiered close vote system since close votes can be cast beginning with 3,000 reputation.

Reputation   Close vote weight
3,000        0.5
10,000       1.0
20,000       2.5

These are completely made up and for illustrative purposes

The minimum vote "count" could still remain at 5, but a combination of these users could satisfy a close:

1 @ 3,000  (0.5)
2 @ 10,000 (2.0)
1 @ 20,000 (2.5)
           -----
            5.0

Or

2 @ 20,000 (5.0)
           -----
            5.0

Or

5 @ 10,000 (5.0)
           -----
            5.0