I will have been at Stack Overflow for three years this summer. Although I have mostly stopped answering questions long ago, I still rake in the occasional piece of rep, and have thus amassed >60k, most of it in [this one tag](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/c++), where, in over a year of me slacking, they still haven't managed to push me off the list of the top 20 users. (Suckers, the bunch of them!) I am a [trusted user](http://stackoverflow.com/privileges/trusted-user) thrice over, a mere step below a moderator, I can edit just about anything on the site, and with the click of my forefinger cast a third of the necessary power to atomize (or rematerialize) any question or answer given by anyone. I have been in the chat since >2.5 years. I am one of the owners of [one of the most popular rooms](http://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/info/10/loungec), where [all of the most frequent users](http://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/info/10/loungec?id=10&tab=general&users=frequent) are >10k (half of them 50k or above), and I have my share in the room having developed its own [FAQ and wiki](http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/3504574#3504574), and a whole set of [memes](http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/10?m=2874088#2874088) and [idiosyncrasies](http://loungecpp.wikidot.com/owners%3Anewbie-hints#toc8). --- Yet, when I need to split a message in the chat because it gets too long (I know you wouldn't have guessed, but I am a bit long-winded sometimes), cut out the second half, hit enter, paste it back, and hit enter again, the chat server greets me with ___"you can try this action in ... seconds"___, and requires me to grab the mouse to click on "retry", by which time someone else will have sneaked in a dumb technical message, interrupting my beautifully crafted, witty, universally applicable, and most philosophic statement—very likely with some stupid template meta-programming bullshit. Incredible as it may seem to the praised creators of the chat (Long may they live!), but ___I really resent that___. What is that "feature" good for for, actually? Do you think it likely that, after almost three years on Stack Overflow, I am about to script up a bot that dumps an endless stream of spam into the chat? Or do you really think I can type fast enough to prevent everyone else from slipping a message in once in a while, thereby bringing the chat server to a grinding halt under the sheer weight of my voluptuously opulent thoughts? You know, I kind of can see the point in not letting everyone roam totally freely when you have almost 7k users who can flood the chat with anything they want to (until they are flagged and caught, that is). But the <1000 trusted users? Really, _where is the point in preventing them from committing several chat messages in under one second once in a while?_ ---- _Note:_ Since this is threatening to go the way [Konrad's request](http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/74884/133368) went and become buried under tons of _Is-it-Friday-yet-in-Iceland_ postings and the proverbial _unicorn wankery_, I removed [meta-tag:discussion] and added [meta-tag:feature-request] instead. To be absolutely clear, here is my feature request spelled out plainly: > ___I want that built-in brake removed for 10k, or, at the very least, 20k, users, or, at the very least, slackened, so that they can post more messages in short succession.___ And I would love to see that [meta-tag:status-planned] tag on this question rather soon.