All Questions
22
questions
13
votes
0
answers
86
views
Add "Skips" to Advanced Review Statistics
So on Code Review we currently have a rather wide margin of time that's used on close-vote reviews. The "slowest" user is averaging out at 180 seconds per review, the "fastest" is clocking in at 10.
...
14
votes
0
answers
139
views
Means of marking individual review outcomes as incorrect even after another edit has been made
A known problem is that sometimes bad suggested edits get approved. Moderators have a tool in the form of suggested edit bans to deal with this, but those bans aren’t always immediately appropriate.
...
31
votes
1
answer
255
views
Invalidate reviews by known robo-reviewers
Today, I saw a known robo-reviewer get out of a well-deserved review suspension, only to continue rubber-stamping every review in sight again.
Some robo-reviewers get review-banned 10 times or more, ...
37
votes
1
answer
358
views
Edit reviewers don't know how to review because nobody told them!
I recently created a Stack Overflow chat room to whip low-quality edit reviewers into shape.
It… worked. Most of them said they would be more careful about minor/invalid/vandalism edits and that they ...
4
votes
0
answers
78
views
How can we address the relative imbalance in the review queue lengths? [duplicate]
In an effort to unashamedly pursue cool looking hats like these improve the quality of the glorious SO forums, it seems that whereas the Close Votes queue looks my work inbox after spending so much ...
3
votes
1
answer
105
views
A Reviewer Rating [duplicate]
I noticed some real egregious reviewing on this question. It was closed as a duplicate of a question that it doesn't come close to duplicating, the OP's problem being that of formatting Excel via C#, ...
25
votes
2
answers
262
views
Vary the number of audits depending on the review history of a user
This is basically a feature-request-ification of this post of mine
From what I see, Stack Overflow mods are having to spend time manually rooting out robo reviewers. To me, it seems like the system ...
91
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Could we make the review-banned-by-a-mod notice say something more descriptive?
Since we got minitech as a mod (yay!), lots of people have been getting review banned (and rightfully so).
Many of these people come to Meta to complain/ask about it. When they do, they seem to be ...
6
votes
3
answers
633
views
Remove Reviewer and Steward badges
Badges should encourage good behaviour. But what when a badge encourages more bad behaviour than good?
We hear it all the time - robo reviewers, badge-hunters. The review system fights with that ...
2
votes
0
answers
51
views
getting over-tested in review session [duplicate]
I've just had a go at reviewing... Got a completely stupid answer, flagged it, was congratulated... Then I got another test. Another. Another. I did about 15 reviews; there was one genuine question.
...
-8
votes
2
answers
90
views
Can we have a "short edit" warning in the Suggested Edits queue?
After seeing cases like this where an obviously too minor edit is approved (not incorrect, mind you, just too minor) I think we need a "short edit" warning in the suggested edits queue. For example, ...
10
votes
2
answers
77
views
Increase number of suggested edits reviewers if there is no consensus between them
There have been a number of highly voted discussions regarding incorrect suggested edits approved: first, second, third, fourth.
I think that often when bad suggested edit is approved, it actually ...
-1
votes
1
answer
66
views
Review feedback
Just now I stumbled upon a certain question and noticed that at least the title was horrible. It happened to be a 1 rep user who just asked his first question, so I guess the user cannot be blamed too ...
51
votes
1
answer
630
views
Mechanism to provide feedback to reviewers who rubber stamp?
During a recent Review Suggested Edits session, I came across a reviewer who is clearly rubber stamping edits (Approved 550 edit suggestions and rejected 7), and who had missed an obvious case of ...
34
votes
0
answers
318
views
"Revolving door" reviews are getting out of control [duplicate]
Possible Duplicate:
The current review system encourages fake reviews; some people upvote everything rather than actually fixing problems
I just saw this question pop up in the "review edits" ...