Proposal:
If a <2k user's past N
suggested edits are all approved ("good edit streak"), make their following suggested edits only require one approval.
For rejections, I can't think of a reason to change the number of rejections required to reject the suggested edit (decreasing or increasing), but this is worth discussion here. Perhaps if there is one rejection but not yet two, the number of required approvals could fallback to two (without immediately breaking the streak).
If we want to press harder on encouraging suggestors to try to learn from improvements others make on top of their edits, we could consider making looks-ok-&-improve reviews also reset the streak counter. There is also this dedicated feature-request on the subject: "Help users discover and learn from the results of their edit suggestions".
I'm not sure what a good value of N
is. In my head, the first number I thought of was 10, but there was nothing scientific about that.
Related FAQ post: How do suggested edits work?
Rationale
(in forward order of causation, and reverse order of size of groups that benefit)
Reduce pressure on the queue for users that have shown to be trustworthy
But don't trust them too much either (streak mechanism)Let trustworthy editors edit at a faster rate
and incentivize keen suggestors to learn to improve when their edits are rejected
(well, if they edit more, then it somewhat "nullifies" the previous mentioned benefit, but...)Community gets good edits faster
Motivation
Experience reports of staff from the 2022 community-a-thon report that the edit suggestion process is slow on the edit-suggestor side. (See Aaron Bertrand's report, and John M. Wright's report). I also felt that way before I reached 2k rep.
Other related Proposals
To solve the opposite problem of too many poor edit suggestions, we added the 5-pending-suggestions-at-a-time limit. This proposal shouldn't undermine that: The streak is reset when poor edits get rejected. There could be benefit for loosening that limit of 5 for suggestors with a good streak (but I smell feature creep in this post).
Revert the 2017 the top bar change: show 2k users the size of the suggested edits review queue at all times. Rationale: showing it everywhere encourages giving the queue attention.
Get rid of the 2k rep threshold for the edit privilege and allow/make reviewers vote on whether user is trusted enough to give full edit privileges. I heard of this from @KevinB. No link handy (sorry).
There have been two previous feature requests for a review bypass mechanism based on percentage of approved suggested edits. I am not proposing a total review bypass, and I'm proposing a mechanism that can "change its mind" about trust quickly, which should be less susceptible to "gain-trust-then-be-evil" abuse.
Giving edit privilege based on number of trustworthy edits. Other room for improvement: I found the details of the proposal confusing / somewhat incoherent and commented there.
bypassing the review queue for avid editors. Other room for improvement: Lots of focus on rationale and motivation, but doesn't flesh out anything concrete for implementation.
Spotlighted Discussion
Sonic says:
A bit of an alternate perspective: one major reason why I continued to edit anonymously was because I wanted my edits to be reviewed for accuracy. If this were implemented back then, I wouldn't like it.
My response: We could let users opt-out of the "streak benefit", and give a short explanation of why someone might want to ("I'm a bit unsure. Please give me two peer-reviews"). I'd suggest such an opt-out to be changeable per-suggested-edit (instead of a global setting accessible only in the user profile). That way simple edits like formatting, spelling, and grammar can still be easily opt-in.