Timeline for Send authors an inbox message if their question is closed
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
92 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2020 at 10:47 | comment | added | TamaMcGlinn | @Wrzlprmft this was fixed in November 2020. I needed to dig down to this answer. If OP accepts that answer, we can save future readers a lot of time. | |
| Nov 17, 2020 at 10:19 | answer | added | Yaakov Ellis | timeline score: 19 | |
| Nov 17, 2020 at 10:18 | history | edited | Yaakov Ellis |
edited tags
|
|
| S Jul 11, 2020 at 15:47 | history | bounty ended | YuiTo Cheng | ||
| S Jul 11, 2020 at 15:47 | history | notice removed | YuiTo Cheng | ||
| S Jul 4, 2020 at 2:00 | history | bounty started | YuiTo Cheng | ||
| S Jul 4, 2020 at 2:00 | history | notice added | YuiTo Cheng | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Jun 21, 2020 at 8:09 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft | @YaakovEllis: What is the current status of this? The last information we have is that it was in A/B testing. I simply want to know whether I still need to leave an extra comment to tell users I closed their question so they get to know it. | |
| Mar 18, 2020 at 20:34 | history | edited | Yaakov Ellis |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 18, 2020 at 19:51 | history | edited | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
"on hold" is no longer used
|
| Mar 18, 2020 at 18:47 | history | edited | TinkeringbellMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 9, 2019 at 16:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Dec 9, 2019 at 17:19 | |||||
| May 7, 2019 at 13:49 | answer | added | billpg | timeline score: 9 | |
| S Nov 29, 2018 at 21:39 | history | bounty ended | Picachieu | ||
| S Nov 29, 2018 at 21:39 | history | notice removed | Picachieu | ||
| Nov 24, 2018 at 22:44 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | @publicstaticvoidmain Note that a bounty is not a useful way to get official attention for feature requests; it's a good way to get community input, but not official input: See: How do I get attention for old, unfixed bug reports and feature requests without official responses here on Meta?. | |
| S Nov 24, 2018 at 22:13 | history | bounty started | Picachieu | ||
| S Nov 24, 2018 at 22:13 | history | notice added | Picachieu | Authoritative reference needed | |
| S Nov 19, 2018 at 15:31 | history | bounty ended | Picachieu | ||
| S Nov 19, 2018 at 15:31 | history | notice removed | Picachieu | ||
| S Nov 14, 2018 at 20:07 | history | bounty started | Picachieu | ||
| S Nov 14, 2018 at 20:07 | history | notice added | Picachieu | Draw attention | |
| Jul 2, 2018 at 18:08 | comment | added | End Antisemitic Hate | Well, it's been over 7 years since this was posted, and there is still no notification. How can this situation be improved? | |
| Dec 30, 2017 at 22:43 | history | edited | Shadow Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Term has changed over the years
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 17, 2017 at 17:29 | answer | added | Jon Ericson | timeline score: 15 | |
| Oct 15, 2016 at 7:55 | comment | added | Андрей Беньковский | I think the SE team just forgot about this request. How can we attract their attention to the topic? Is posting an another question asking "Why wasn't this feature request implemented?" a good idea? | |
| S Jan 26, 2016 at 8:50 | history | bounty ended | Wrzlprmft | ||
| S Jan 26, 2016 at 8:50 | history | notice removed | Wrzlprmft | ||
| Jan 20, 2016 at 1:49 | answer | added | Anthony Pham | timeline score: 16 | |
| S Jan 19, 2016 at 8:41 | history | bounty started | Wrzlprmft | ||
| S Jan 19, 2016 at 8:41 | history | notice added | Wrzlprmft | Draw attention | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 20:35 | answer | added | Wrzlprmft | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jan 9, 2016 at 12:44 | comment | added | abligh | Related (ultimately a dupe): meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272648/… - I did not initially understand that 'on hold' was a species of 'closed', but the notification should also apply to when a question is put on hold. | |
| S Nov 16, 2015 at 12:15 | history | suggested | ivan_pozdeev |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 16, 2015 at 10:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 16, 2015 at 12:15 | |||||
| Jun 18, 2015 at 9:24 | answer | added | Flimm | timeline score: 25 | |
| S Jun 13, 2015 at 12:12 | history | bounty ended | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S Jun 13, 2015 at 12:12 | history | notice removed | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| Jun 8, 2015 at 18:39 | answer | added | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | timeline score: 49 | |
| Jun 7, 2015 at 4:22 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | @RobertHarvey I've seen questions closed after days/weeks/months; monitoring the question for the first few hours/days doesn't help people find out about that. | |
| S Jun 6, 2015 at 13:10 | history | bounty started | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S Jun 6, 2015 at 13:10 | history | notice added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Canonical answer required | |
| S Jan 13, 2015 at 17:31 | history | bounty ended | Braiam | ||
| S Jan 13, 2015 at 17:31 | history | notice removed | Braiam | ||
| Jan 7, 2015 at 12:20 | answer | added | Wrzlprmft | timeline score: 55 | |
| S Jan 6, 2015 at 17:39 | history | bounty started | Braiam | ||
| S Jan 6, 2015 at 17:39 | history | notice added | Braiam | Draw attention | |
| S Oct 21, 2014 at 1:22 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 21, 2014 at 1:22 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 13, 2014 at 0:21 | history | bounty started | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S Oct 13, 2014 at 0:21 | history | notice added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Authoritative reference needed | |
| S Aug 1, 2014 at 7:01 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 1, 2014 at 7:01 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 24, 2014 at 9:21 | answer | added | JonK | timeline score: 68 | |
| S Jul 24, 2014 at 5:13 | history | bounty started | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jul 24, 2014 at 5:13 | history | notice added | user259867 | Current answers are outdated | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| S Feb 3, 2014 at 3:31 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Feb 3, 2014 at 3:31 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jan 26, 2014 at 2:02 | history | bounty started | Pekka | ||
| S Jan 26, 2014 at 2:02 | history | notice added | Pekka | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Jan 23, 2014 at 1:19 | history | post merged (destination) | |||
| S Jan 21, 2014 at 20:12 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jan 21, 2014 at 20:12 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jan 13, 2014 at 19:06 | history | bounty started | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jan 13, 2014 at 19:06 | history | notice added | user102937 | Draw attention | |
| Jan 6, 2014 at 7:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jan 6, 2014 at 7:58 | |||||
| S Jan 5, 2014 at 18:28 | history | suggested | Anderson Green | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
These notifications should give users a chance to learn from their mistakes.
|
| Jan 5, 2014 at 18:26 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 5, 2014 at 18:28 | |||||
| S Dec 14, 2013 at 19:13 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Dec 14, 2013 at 19:13 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 7, 2013 at 4:02 | history | edited | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarify that this is suggesting inbox messages, not "notification list" notifications.
|
| Dec 6, 2013 at 18:37 | history | edited | Shog9 |
edited tags
|
|
| S Dec 6, 2013 at 18:06 | history | bounty started | Madara's Ghost | ||
| S Dec 6, 2013 at 18:06 | history | notice added | Madara's Ghost | Draw attention | |
| Jul 25, 2013 at 17:31 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 25, 2013 at 21:53 | |||||
| S Jul 1, 2013 at 4:01 | history | suggested | Anderson Green | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Slight paraphrasing, and explaining why these details are relevant to the question
|
| Jul 1, 2013 at 3:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 1, 2013 at 4:01 | |||||
| S Jul 1, 2013 at 3:41 | history | edited | Antony | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
adding information about question migration and automatic question deletion
|
| S Jul 1, 2013 at 3:41 | history | suggested | Anderson Green | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
adding information about question migration and automatic question deletion
|
| Jul 1, 2013 at 3:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jul 1, 2013 at 3:41 | |||||
| Mar 16, 2012 at 14:09 | answer | added | Manishearth | timeline score: 162 | |
| Sep 20, 2011 at 10:25 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 9, 2011 at 2:10 | comment | added | user unknown | @Robert: You needn't check your question actively, because you get a notification about the answer in a box at the top left (at least in Firefox on Linux, I do so). And a closed question can be reopened, if you improve it, for example - in the particular example, things are different, but in general. | |
| Jun 8, 2011 at 21:52 | comment | added | user102937 | Ah, I see. So it's for educational reasons. | |
| Jun 8, 2011 at 21:49 | comment | added | Ton Plomp | @Mark Yes I did receive the comment. However that is just polite behaviour by Gilles, and not something enforced by the system. @Robert I would check my questions after a week or so (some questions are just posted out of interest), and if I saw a question being closed I wouldn't response, but as I explained next questions whould be better. | |
| Jun 8, 2011 at 21:49 | comment | added | user102937 | If you posted a question, that means that you are expecting answers, so you should be periodically checking your question anyway. What would your response be if you got a close notification? How does the close notification improve your interaction with the site? (closed questions are essentially end-games). | |
| Jun 8, 2011 at 21:44 | comment | added | user149432 | You should've received a notification from Gilles's comment explaining that he was about to close it and why. Did you not? | |
| Jun 5, 2011 at 18:10 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Used the official name of Stack Exchange -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, "Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name".
|
| Jun 5, 2011 at 1:16 | history | asked | TheLQ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |