Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 10
    Fair points. I too would prefer to get these closed as duplicates, but in my experience, finding a well-answered original question is a lot of work, especially for trivial questions because they usually contain so many common terms. It's an effort that often doesn't really feel worth putting in it for a trivial question. I realize this new close reason would be a politely put "RTFM" but I think it's necessary simply because of the sheer numbers. Also, if a manual link can be provided, the newbie will still get their answer.
    – Pekka
    Commented Apr 5, 2011 at 15:05
  • 2
    If the close requires a link to the general reference and is still searchable, I think this problem is mostly negated.
    – Brian
    Commented Jun 8, 2011 at 20:07
  • One that goes to your point of strange wordings / poor understandings: stackoverflow.com/questions/6613890/… I think they should be closed immediately and downvoted into oblivion, though :)
    – Fosco
    Commented Jul 7, 2011 at 16:47
  • @fosco, looks like it was. -11 in 1 hour Commented Jul 7, 2011 at 17:44