Timeline for Post duplicate autocomments as the Community user
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30 at 1:41 | history | edited | muru | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 844 characters in body
|
| Jun 29 at 9:04 | history | rollback | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Jun 29 at 8:58 | history | edited | starball | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 29 at 3:49 | answer | added | starball | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 29 at 3:39 | comment | added | starball | @KarlKnechtel I disagree. this is a proper usage of the meta framework. if that "parent"/originating question was tagged discussion... maybe, but it's not. it's just a support question. | |
| Jun 29 at 3:35 | comment | added | Karl Knechtel | I get that, but I think it would have been better to list the separate proposals as answers on that question, rather than as separate question posts. | |
| Jun 29 at 2:00 | comment | added | muru | @SonictheAnonymousHedgehog out of curiosity, do you know if it's possible to find out what fraction of such autocomments are edited at all? | |
| Jun 29 at 1:48 | comment | added | muru | @KarlKnechtel see meta.stackexchange.com/questions/401000/… as to why this was posted again | |
| Jun 28 at 18:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 29 at 1:36 | |||||
| Jun 28 at 18:34 | comment | added | Karl Knechtel | This question is similar to: Is a new comment format for duplicate votes being tested?. If you believe it’s different, please edit the question, make it clear how it’s different and/or how the answers on that question are not helpful for your problem. | |
| Jun 28 at 17:24 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | This would create more work for me. The main site I participate on is here, and per policy, questions can be closed as duplicates of more general questions such as faq posts and other canonical posts. I generally go an extra mile and edit the automatic comment to point out or quote the exact part of the target post that answers a question, and if the comment is posted by the Community user, it would not be editable by the voter or flagger, and in my case I'd have to post another comment to not only do the above, but also clarify the automatic text. | |
| Jun 28 at 16:30 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | The only way it becomes public, is when the question gets actually closed. Until then, in the flag/vote was cast directly and not via review, there's no way to know that a specific user voted or flagged to close a specfic question. The auto comment is unique and annoying exception. | |
| Jun 28 at 15:31 | history | asked | muru | CC BY-SA 4.0 |