Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • The only way it becomes public, is when the question gets actually closed. Until then, in the flag/vote was cast directly and not via review, there's no way to know that a specific user voted or flagged to close a specfic question. The auto comment is unique and annoying exception. Commented Jun 28 at 16:30
  • 1
    This would create more work for me. The main site I participate on is here, and per policy, questions can be closed as duplicates of more general questions such as faq posts and other canonical posts. I generally go an extra mile and edit the automatic comment to point out or quote the exact part of the target post that answers a question, and if the comment is posted by the Community user, it would not be editable by the voter or flagger, and in my case I'd have to post another comment to not only do the above, but also clarify the automatic text. Commented Jun 28 at 17:24
  • 3
    This question is similar to: Is a new comment format for duplicate votes being tested?. If you believe it’s different, please edit the question, make it clear how it’s different and/or how the answers on that question are not helpful for your problem. Commented Jun 28 at 18:34
  • @KarlKnechtel see meta.stackexchange.com/questions/401000/… as to why this was posted again
    – muru
    Commented Jun 29 at 1:48
  • @SonictheAnonymousHedgehog out of curiosity, do you know if it's possible to find out what fraction of such autocomments are edited at all?
    – muru
    Commented Jun 29 at 2:00
  • I get that, but I think it would have been better to list the separate proposals as answers on that question, rather than as separate question posts. Commented Jun 29 at 3:35
  • 5
    @KarlKnechtel I disagree. this is a proper usage of the meta framework. if that "parent"/originating question was tagged discussion... maybe, but it's not. it's just a support question.
    – starball
    Commented Jun 29 at 3:39