Timeline for Proposed changes to Help Center articles to include mention of AI-generated content policy
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
33 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22 at 15:29 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 211 characters in body
|
| Feb 22 at 12:04 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1710 characters in body
|
| Feb 20 at 11:02 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 16 at 15:08 | comment | added | Thomas Owens | The edits seem to address my concerns with the original versions. I would propose one minor change: "may be used to assist with translating content" -> "may be used to assist with editing content" or "may be used to assist with editing and translating content". Translating alone is likely to be too narrow and not inclusive of other types of editing. | |
| Feb 16 at 14:51 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
several changes, to address feedback in multiple posts below I'll be marking [status-completed] shortly
|
| Feb 14 at 11:44 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 225 characters in body
|
| Feb 13 at 15:42 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
changes to address https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/396656/208518 and https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/396662/208518
|
| Feb 13 at 15:35 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
changes to address concerns at https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/396634/208518
|
| Feb 9 at 7:23 | answer | added | Rebecca J. Stones | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 9 at 5:43 | comment | added | user13267 | If there isn't going to be a clear universal policy with regards to ai tool usage for all se sites, then does SE have any plans to clarify if the heuristics are being followed properly ? General info on the status of how (or if) they are being used? | |
| Feb 9 at 1:26 | answer | added | nekketsuuu | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 9 at 0:39 | answer | added | msh210 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 8 at 21:00 | answer | added | Karsten | timeline score: 14 | |
| Feb 8 at 19:52 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | As per suggestions in one of the answers, I'll also be providing a second template to be used for sites that opt for a policy that disallows this content, so they don't need to start their help center articles from scratch. Thanks for your patience, feedback, and help, everyone! ^_^' | |
| Feb 8 at 19:51 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | Apologies for changing the roll-out plan, and for any confusion this might've caused. Revision 9 of the post lands on (hopefully!) the final form of this plan: all sites will have a new help center article explaining why AI-generated content needs to be cited, unless they have a superseding policy that disallows it. In discussion with mods in the TL, it became apparent that the "needs citation" banner shouldn't be on by default, and instead any banner should only be enabled by request from that community. | |
| Feb 8 at 19:43 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 187 characters in body
|
| Feb 8 at 19:08 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | Just signal it to the CM Team that you don't want the banner enabled, @T.E.D. ;) (it's the bullet point in bold near the top of the post) | |
| Feb 8 at 18:47 | comment | added | T.E.D. | What if a site already has a "No AI Answers" policy? | |
| Feb 8 at 18:18 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edits to address https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/396633/208518; might still need cleanup as per https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/396630/208518
|
| Feb 8 at 17:54 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected discrepancies in usage of "AI" and "artificial intelligence"
|
| Feb 8 at 17:45 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 248 characters in body
|
| Feb 8 at 16:17 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarification on the plagiarism help center article, as per suggestion and discussion on https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/396644/208518
|
| Feb 8 at 16:12 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Feb 8 at 16:04 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Feb 8 at 15:08 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | The default, network-wide stance on AI-generated content is that, if allowed on any site, it needs to be properly cited; some sites may choose to completely disallow it instead. I'm laying out a framework that allows sites to decide which of the two they want, and to request a corresponding banner be enabled. The heuristics will apply regardless of the site policy, as I see it — they serve for folks to determine whether the content "is AI-generated" or not; the action taken once the determination is made varies depending on the policy. Can you clarify what your concern is, @user13267? | |
| Feb 8 at 14:45 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarified roll out a bit, given how it may clash with some sites' existing policies
|
| Feb 8 at 12:47 | answer | added | Thomas Owens | timeline score: 9 | |
| Feb 8 at 10:56 | answer | added | Mithical | timeline score: 9 | |
| Feb 8 at 1:56 | comment | added | user13267 | If moderators on each site can override this to have whatever policy they want (if I understood the situation correctly) then whats the point of even having this? I would assume if this is the entire site's policy, all sub-sites would have a policy that would be a subset of this and not some completely different random thing. And whatever happened to the heuristics that a post is supposed to have met, before being actionable for it being created using help from an ai tool? | |
| Feb 7 at 23:12 | answer | added | cocomac | timeline score: 21 | |
| Feb 7 at 21:23 | answer | added | Resistance Is Futile | timeline score: 30 | |
| Feb 7 at 17:57 | answer | added | Thomas Owens | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 7 at 16:30 | history | asked | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |