Timeline for Ban ChatGPT network-wide
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2023 at 18:50 | comment | added | Karl Knechtel | Politics is primarily about persuasion and "oughts", not facts and "ises" - using the term "plausible" muddies the waters. If someone can be tricked into debating one's own political position with an overgrown language model that performs no critical thinking, that should be taken as a sign that the human in that exchange has also not met a minimum standard of critical thinking. | |
| Dec 17, 2022 at 11:42 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading [<https://meta.stackexchange.com/legal/trademark-guidance> (the last section)]. Added some context.
|
| Dec 16, 2022 at 18:07 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | @starball no pride, just knowledge exchange or improving one's reasoning ability. | |
| Dec 16, 2022 at 18:06 | comment | added | starball | @FranckDernoncourt that sounds so... soulless. as a high rep user, don't you take some pride in the humanity of your style and thought-process? | |
| Dec 16, 2022 at 17:15 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | If high-rep users "have demonstrated that they are worthy of that trust or measure of expertise", why not trust them to only copy ChatGPT when it's correct? | |
| Dec 16, 2022 at 16:25 | history | answered | CDJB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |